Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

EVA MAERSK

IMO: 9682992
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 107,266 t
Flag (estimated): Denmark
Port of registry: Svendborg
Technical efficiency: EEDI 2.65 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: BRITISH TRADITION

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SYNERGY DENMARK A/S · part of Synergy Marine

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 66,480 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

151

Oil tanker median 138 kg/nm (+9%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.09

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.83 (−20%)

Average speed

10.6 kn

Oil tanker median 9.7 kn (+9%)

Fuel per day at sea

38.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,165 t

CO₂ emitted

16,173 t

Distance sailed

34,314 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,244 h

135 days, 37% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 138 kg/nm · median 129 (+7%)

76.1Ranks 1,001 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 12.0 kn · median 10.7 (+12%)

8.0Faster than 88% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 4.03 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (−49%)

4.51Ranks 93 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU39%
Into the EU55%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

923 t

5.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EVA MAERSK
Oil tanker median

120.0140.0160.0180.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EVA MAERSK
Oil tanker median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EVA MAERSK
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.5 kn	+2%	+6%	−13%	−31%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	−5%	−8%	+267%	–	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−16%	−17%	+118%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.6 kn	+17%	+23%	−51%	+1%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.9 kn	−2%	−9%	+46%	−1%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.6 kn	−2%	+13%	−70%	−14%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+2.7 kn	−16%	+12%	−16%	+1%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	SYNERGY DENMARK A/S	6,964	21,845	50,534	4,210	12.0	138	4.03	68%
2024	SYNERGY DENMARK A/S	7,883	24,734	58,360	5,079	11.5	135	5.81	63%
2023	not published	2,268	7,116	15,899	1,348	11.8	143	–	69%
2022	not published	1,243	3,920	7,304	615	11.9	170	6.13	78%
2021	not published	2,195	6,973	15,057	1,333	11.3	146	6.05	–
2020	not published	1,530	4,778	10,334	849	12.2	148	6.10	–
2019	not published	5,165	16,173	34,314	3,244	10.6	151	7.09	–
2018	not published	7,284	22,845	40,718	5,139	7.9	179	7.01	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	SYNERGY DENMARK A/S	4.03	7.95	−49%	93 of 1,665	ABS	A+C
2024	SYNERGY DENMARK A/S	5.81	8.06	−28%	438 of 1,787	ABS	A+C
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	ABS	–
2022	not published	6.13	8.51	−28%	486 of 1,961	ABS	C
2021	not published	6.05	8.86	−32%	411 of 1,789	ABS	C
2020	not published	6.10	9.03	−32%	376 of 1,870	ABS	C
2019	not published	7.09	8.83	−20%	631 of 1,919	ABS	–
2018	not published	7.01	8.86	−21%	585 of 1,779	ABS	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.