Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

KMARIN RESOLUTION

IMO: 9683051
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 59,383 t
Flag (estimated): Isle of Man
Port of registry: Douglas
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3.19 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: BRITISH RESOLUTION, KMARIN RESOLUTION

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SYNERGY MARITIME PRIVATE LIMITED · part of Synergy Marine

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 76,444 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

154

Oil tanker median 131 kg/nm (+17%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.39

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.51 (−25%)

Average speed

10.0 kn

Oil tanker median 10.9 kn (−8%)

Fuel per day at sea

37.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,036 t

CO₂ emitted

6,457 t

Distance sailed

13,218 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,316 h

55 days, 15% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 149 kg/nm · median 129 (+16%)

76.1Ranks 1,167 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 9.4 kn · median 10.7 (−12%)

8.0Faster than 21% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.99 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+1%)

4.51Ranks 841 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU49%
Into the EU39%
At berth in the EU11%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

724 t

11.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

KMARIN RESOLUTION
Oil tanker median

100.0120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

KMARIN RESOLUTION
Oil tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

KMARIN RESOLUTION
Oil tanker median

5.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.9 kn	−16%	−7%	+707%	−40%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2024	−1.5 kn	+15%	−3%	−71%	+109%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+4.0 kn	−20%	+35%	+9%	+3%	4.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−3.7 kn	+37%	−16%	−70%	−22%	3.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 37%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−1.2 kn	+25%	+11%	+78%	+51%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 25%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+4.8 kn	−31%	+24%	−26%	−18%	4.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 31%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	SYNERGY MARITIME PRIVATE LIMITED	4,633	14,729	31,043	3,298	9.4	149	7.99	–
2024	SYNERGY MARITIME PRIVATE LIMITED	683	2,191	3,845	454	8.5	178	13.4	–
2022	not published	2,036	6,457	13,218	1,316	10.0	154	6.39	–
2021	not published	2,324	7,345	12,138	2,035	6.0	192	6.18	–
2020	not published	5,728	18,121	41,043	4,215	9.7	140	7.93	–
2019	not published	2,580	8,091	23,103	2,116	10.9	112	5.25	–
2018	not published	5,060	15,835	31,254	5,151	6.1	162	6.37	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	SYNERGY MARITIME PRIVATE LIMITED	7.99	7.95	+1%	841 of 1,665	DNV	A
2024	SYNERGY MARITIME PRIVATE LIMITED	13.4	8.06	+66%	1,380 of 1,787	DNV	A
2022	not published	6.39	8.51	−25%	547 of 1,961	DNV	B
2021	not published	6.18	8.86	−30%	442 of 1,789	DNV	B
2020	not published	7.93	9.03	−12%	759 of 1,870	DNV	B
2019	not published	5.25	8.83	−41%	294 of 1,919	ABS	–
2018	not published	6.37	8.86	−28%	477 of 1,779	ABS	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.