Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

GASLOG GLASGOW

IMO: 9687021
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Bermuda
Port of registry: Hamilton
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.76 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): LNG or an alternative fuel (no methane data to tell them apart)

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

211

LNG carrier median 231 kg/nm (−8%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

6.41

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (−30%)

Average speed

15.1 kn

LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

76.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,954 t

CO₂ emitted

41,383 t

Distance sailed

70,719 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,697 h

196 days, 54% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 355 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 211 kg/nm · median 231 (−8%)

167Ranks 145 of 355, lowest first359

Average speedThis ship 15.1 kn · median 14.2 (+6%)

10.7Faster than 72% of LNG carrier ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 6.41 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.10 (−30%)

5.47Ranks 80 of 355, lowest first17.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU48%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,022 t

2.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GASLOG GLASGOW
LNG carrier median

200.0220.0240.0260.0

’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

GASLOG GLASGOW
LNG carrier median

14.014.314.514.815.015.3

’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

GASLOG GLASGOW
LNG carrier median

6.08.010.012.0

’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	−1%	−2%	+32%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2023LNG / alt.	not published	14,954	41,383	70,719	4,697	15.1	211	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	11,462	32,202	53,600	3,544	15.1	214	–	61%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023LNG / alt.	not published	6.41	9.10	−30%	80 of 355	ABS	B+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	6.23	10.4	−40%	52 of 379	ABS	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.