Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

GRENDI FUTURA

IMO: 9687306
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 3,768 t
Port of registry: Bari
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.37 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: WEDELLSBORG, MOBILE EXPRESS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: K-Ships S.r.l.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,768 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

107.4 kg/nm

Ro-ro median 104.6 kg/nm (+3%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

89.06

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 95.19 (−6%)

Average speed

13.1 kn

Ro-ro median 14.4 kn (−9%)

Fuel per day at sea

33.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,773 t

CO₂ emitted

14,917 t

15,151 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

44,453 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,393 h

141 days, 39% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 107.4 kg/nm · median 104.6 (+3%)

56.6Ranks 123 of 235, lowest first145.3

Average speedThis ship 13.1 kn · median 14.4 (−9%)

10.9Faster than 31% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 89.06 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.19 (−6%)

47.35Ranks 108 of 235, lowest first297.27

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports47%
From the EU21%
Into the EU21%
At berth in the EU11%

79% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (11,754 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

10.7%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

GRENDI FUTURA
Ro-ro median

80.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GRENDI FUTURA
Ro-ro median

13.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

GRENDI FUTURA
Ro-ro median

50.0100150200250300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.0 kn	+12%	+4%	−22%	+26%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.8 kn	−8%	−13%	−23%	−17%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	+4%	+1%	−11%	−9%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+3%	+2%	+11%	−13%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+2.0 kn	+16%	+34%	+0%	−46%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.8 kn	+4%	−9%	−21%	−24%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.7 kn	−22%	−19%	+36%	+116%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	K-Ships S.r.l.	4,773	14,917	44,453	3,393	13.1	107.4	89.06	–
2024part-year	Dania Ship Management Bulk A/S	1,625	5,070	17,007	1,211	14.0	95.6	70.67	–
2024	K-Ships Srl	5,455	17,037	56,838	4,030	14.1	96.0	70.78	–
2023	not published	7,698	24,055	73,371	4,923	14.9	104.9	85.66	–
2022	not published	8,308	25,915	82,768	5,383	15.4	100.4	93.66	–
2021	not published	7,272	22,690	74,273	4,826	15.4	97.9	107.77	–
2020	not published	6,262	19,529	74,183	5,544	13.4	84.4	201.33	–
2019	not published	7,673	23,905	94,152	6,197	15.2	81.5	266.28	–
2018	not published	7,283	22,744	69,423	4,790	14.5	104.9	123.29	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	K-Ships S.r.l.	89.06	95.19	−6%	108 of 235	DNV	A+B
2024part-year	Dania Ship Management Bulk A/S	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	B
2024	K-Ships Srl	70.78	97.53	−27%	51 of 220	DNV	A+B
2023	not published	85.66	108.62	−21%	81 of 221	Lloyd's Register	B
2022	not published	93.66	90.62	+3%	118 of 223	Lloyd's Register	B
2021	not published	107.77	103.64	+4%	119 of 219	Lloyd's Register	B
2020	not published	201.33	102.77	+96%	183 of 238	Lloyd's Register	B
2019	not published	266.28	90.89	+193%	238 of 271	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	123.29	91.03	+35%	167 of 260	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.