Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

KONTICH

IMO: 9687502
Type: Gas carrier
Average cargo carried: 10,827 t
Flag (estimated): Belgium
Port of registry: Antwerpen
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.18 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Exmar Shipping BV · part of Exmar

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 11,999 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

125

Gas carrier (LPG) median 87.4 kg/nm (+43%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

32.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 53.1 (−39%)

Average speed

8.0 kn

Gas carrier (LPG) median 10.5 kn (−24%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,426 t

CO₂ emitted

20,061 t

Distance sailed

51,347 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,424 h

268 days, 73% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 95.2 kg/nm · median 81.5 (+17%)

49.8Ranks 240 of 355, lowest first124

Average speedThis ship 14.6 kn · median 12.6 (+16%)

8.8Faster than 89% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 27.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.6 (−23%)

14.4Ranks 146 of 355, lowest first120

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports71%
From the EU9%
Into the EU7%
At berth in the EU13%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,594 t

12.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

KONTICH
Gas carrier (LPG) median

80.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

KONTICH
Gas carrier (LPG) median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

KONTICH
Gas carrier (LPG) median

20.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.6 kn	−3%	+1%	+125%	−26%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2024	+0.7 kn	−9%	−4%	−76%	+1%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.6 kn	−4%	+1%	−6%	+13%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	−10%	−10%	−5%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	+9%	+9%	−13%	+8%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+4.7 kn	−9%	+44%	+2%	−2%	4.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Exmar Shipping BV	2,069	6,449	21,722	1,491	14.6	95.2	27.4	–
2024	Exmar Shipping BV	950	2,963	9,667	690	14.0	98.2	37.2	–
2022	not published	4,381	13,681	40,684	3,052	13.3	108	36.7	–
2021	not published	4,848	15,151	43,254	3,418	12.7	112	32.5	–
2020	not published	5,651	17,663	45,593	3,588	12.7	124	34.8	–
2019	not published	5,934	18,535	52,311	4,113	12.7	113	32.1	–
2018	not published	6,426	20,061	51,347	6,424	8.0	125	32.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Gas carrier (LPG) median	vs Gas carrier (LPG)	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Exmar Shipping BV	27.4	35.6	−23%	146 of 355	DNV	B+C
2024	Exmar Shipping BV	37.2	35.8	+4%	162 of 306	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	36.7	42.5	−14%	156 of 348	DNV	C
2021	not published	32.5	46.9	−31%	102 of 323	DNV	B
2020	not published	34.8	42.3	−18%	141 of 339	DNV	B
2019	not published	32.1	45.9	−30%	111 of 331	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	32.6	53.1	−39%	92 of 297	Lloyd's Register	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.