Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

TORM DAVAO

IMO: 9688350
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 35,697 t
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.49 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: STI YORKVILLE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: STI Yorkville Shipping Company Limited · part of Scorpio

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 35,697 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

85.0 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+7%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.46

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (−50%)

Average speed

11.4 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,705 t

CO₂ emitted

5,343 t

5,426 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

20,062 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,753 h

73 days, 20% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 85.0 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+7%)

52.8Ranks 864 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 11.4 kn · median 11.1 (+3%)

8.8Faster than 61% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.46 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (−50%)

7.93Ranks 96 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU38%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU11%

0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

10.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

TORM DAVAO
Oil tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TORM DAVAO
Oil tanker median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

TORM DAVAO
Oil tanker median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	−5%	−5%	−53%	−26%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.7 kn	−0%	−6%	+914%	+28%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.5 kn	+8%	+24%	+18%	–	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.0 kn	+9%	−1%	−91%	–	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.8 kn	+9%	+2%	+211%	−18%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2020	+2.1 kn	−12%	+7%	−18%	−21%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	STI Yorkville Shipping Company Limited	1,705	5,343	20,062	1,753	11.4	85.0	7.46	–
2025	TORM A/S	1,705	5,343	20,062	1,753	11.4	85.0	7.46	–
2024	STI Yorkville Shipping Company Limited	3,840	12,008	42,897	3,760	11.4	89.5	10.02	–
2023	not published	380	1,184	4,232	349	12.1	89.8	7.81	–
2022	not published	299	937	3,591	340	10.6	83.2	–	–
2021	not published	3,226	10,078	42,221	3,637	11.6	76.4	8.60	–
2020	not published	951	2,969	13,596	1,093	12.4	70.0	10.55	–
2018	not published	1,318	4,113	16,669	1,612	10.3	79.1	13.41	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	STI Yorkville Shipping Company Limited	–	–	–	–	DNV	B
2025	TORM A/S	7.46	15.04	−50%	96 of 1,460	DNV	B+C
2024	STI Yorkville Shipping Company Limited	10.02	8.06	+24%	1,169 of 1,787	DNV	B
2023	not published	7.81	8.44	−7%	794 of 1,797	DNV	B
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	B
2021	not published	8.60	8.86	−3%	859 of 1,789	DNV	B
2020	not published	10.55	9.03	+17%	1,124 of 1,870	DNV	B
2018	not published	13.41	8.86	+51%	1,313 of 1,779	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.