Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

HAFNIA VIRIDIAN

IMO: 9690614
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 25,395 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.35 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: NAVIG8 VICTORIA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Suntech Ship management Pte Ltd

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 25,395 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

81.3 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+2%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.06

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (−33%)

Average speed

11.6 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

22.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,703 t

CO₂ emitted

5,352 t

5,436 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

20,950 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,802 h

75 days, 21% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 81.3 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+2%)

52.8Ranks 777 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 11.6 kn · median 11.1 (+5%)

8.8Faster than 67% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.06 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (−33%)

7.93Ranks 346 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports9%
From the EU27%
Into the EU60%
At berth in the EU4%

56% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,022 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

HAFNIA VIRIDIAN
Chemical tanker median

70.080.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

HAFNIA VIRIDIAN
Chemical tanker median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HAFNIA VIRIDIAN
Chemical tanker median

0.010.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2025	+0.7 kn	−4%	+2%	−34%	+27%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	−1%	−7%	−8%	−6%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.6 kn	−11%	−6%	+74%	−29%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.4 kn	+1%	−11%	−6%	+52%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.2 kn	−15%	+14%	+186%	−81%	3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.7 kn	+4%	−20%	−39%	+266%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Suntech Ship management Pte Ltd	1,703	5,352	20,950	1,802	11.6	81.3	10.06	–
2024part-year	TB Marine Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG	3,554	11,134	39,136	3,480	11.2	90.8	9.35	–
2023	not published	2,691	8,423	31,782	2,904	10.9	84.7	7.90	–
2022	not published	2,957	9,346	34,568	2,973	11.6	85.5	8.42	78%
2021	not published	1,910	6,036	19,816	1,799	11.0	96.4	11.92	95%
2020	not published	2,028	6,415	21,139	1,707	12.4	95.9	7.84	–
2019	not published	835	2,633	7,394	801	9.2	112.9	41.24	–
2018	not published	1,319	4,150	12,094	1,019	11.9	109.0	11.28	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Suntech Ship management Pte Ltd	10.06	15.04	−33%	346 of 1,460	DNV	B+C
2024part-year	TB Marine Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG	–	–	–	–	DNV	A+C
2023	not published	7.90	16.23	−51%	71 of 1,314	DNV	A+C
2022	not published	8.42	16.06	−48%	99 of 1,409	ABS	A+C
2021	not published	11.92	16.69	−29%	321 of 1,343	ABS	A+B
2020	not published	7.84	16.16	−51%	56 of 1,312	ABS	A+B
2019	not published	41.24	17.32	+138%	1,174 of 1,321	ABS	A+B
2018	not published	11.28	17.14	−34%	270 of 1,294	ABS	A+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.