Navalyze · Passenger · Ship

KONINGSDAM

IMO: 9692557
Type: Passenger ship
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Rotterdam
Technical efficiency: EIV 31.74 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

302

Passenger median 277 kg/nm (+9%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

399

g CO₂/pax·nm · Passenger median 589 (−32%)

Average speed

13.3 kn

Passenger median 12.9 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

96.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,992 t

CO₂ emitted

50,003 t

Distance sailed

52,874 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,961 h

165 days, 45% of the year

Within the passenger fleet, 2019

Set against all 177 passenger ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 302 kg/nm · median 277 (+9%)

94.8Ranks 98 of 177, lowest first440

Average speedThis ship 13.3 kn · median 12.9 (+3%)

8.6Faster than 54% of passenger ships16.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 399 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 589 (−32%)

353Ranks 46 of 177, lowest first1,628

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Passenger medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports61%
From the EU13%
Into the EU14%
At berth in the EU13%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

6,265 t

12.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Passenger median is the middle ship of all passenger ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

KONINGSDAM
Passenger median

260.0270.0280.0290.0300.0310.0

’182018’192019

Average speed, kn

KONINGSDAM
Passenger median

11.512.012.513.013.5

’182018’192019

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

KONINGSDAM
Passenger median

300400500600

’182018’192019

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2018→2019	+0.7 kn	−1%	+5%	−11%	+10%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2019	not published	15,992	50,003	52,874	3,961	13.3	302	–	–
2018	not published	18,159	56,858	59,418	4,710	12.6	306	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Passenger median	vs Passenger	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2019	not published	399	589	−32%	46 of 177	DNV	A
2018	not published	362	577	−37%	18 of 153	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Passenger ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's passenger ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.