Navalyze · Container · Ship

CSCL ATLANTIC OCEAN

IMO: 9695145
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 115,814 t
Flag (estimated): Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.90 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 144,789 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

302

Container median 172 kg/nm (+75%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.53

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−63%)

Average speed

16.3 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+16%)

Fuel per day at sea

118.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

17,801 t

CO₂ emitted

55,689 t

Distance sailed

58,901 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,620 h

151 days, 41% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,899 container ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 292 kg/nm · median 165 (+77%)

77.6Ranks 1,713 of 1,899, lowest first291

Average speedThis ship 14.7 kn · median 13.2 (+11%)

10.0Faster than 79% of container ships15.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.91 g CO₂/t·nm · median 19.4 (−59%)

7.34Ranks 239 of 1,899, lowest first51.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports31%
From the EU28%
Into the EU39%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,298 t

2.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CSCL ATLANTIC OCEAN
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

CSCL ATLANTIC OCEAN
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CSCL ATLANTIC OCEAN
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	+4%	+1%	+0%	+7%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.5 kn	−9%	−18%	−17%	+3%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	+2%	+5%	−11%	+10%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	−4%	−4%	+210%	−8%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	−2%	−3%	−78%	−6%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2023	not published	12,707	39,831	43,479	2,966	14.7	292	7.91	–
2022	not published	12,171	38,116	43,459	2,862	15.2	280	7.37	–
2021	not published	16,241	50,879	52,634	3,150	16.7	309	7.18	–
2020	not published	17,801	55,689	58,901	3,620	16.3	302	6.53	–
2019	not published	5,973	18,662	18,999	1,168	16.3	314	7.08	–
2018	not published	28,060	87,665	87,706	5,337	16.4	320	7.55	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023	not published	7.91	19.4	−59%	239 of 1,899	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	7.37	19.1	−61%	177 of 1,825	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	7.18	17.9	−60%	151 of 1,781	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	6.53	17.6	−63%	128 of 1,797	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	7.08	18.9	−63%	122 of 1,788	China Classification Society	A
2018	not published	7.55	20.2	−63%	104 of 1,705	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.