Navalyze

Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

LOWLANDS PELIKAAN

IMO
9700005
Type
Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried
15,199 t
Flag (estimated)
Belgium
Port of registry
Antwerp
Technical efficiency
EEDI 4.64 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
WESTERN LONDON

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: COBELFRET NV

?
?

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 26,802 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
79.9
Bulk carrier median 91.4 kg/nm (−13%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
9.34
g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.57 (+9%)
Average speed
10.9 kn
Bulk carrier median 11.5 kn (−5%)
Fuel per day at sea
21.0 t/day
Fuel consumed
884 t
CO₂ emitted
2,768 t
Distance sailed
11,058 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,011 h
42 days, 12% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 60.4 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−27%)
61.0Ranks 339 of 3,611, lowest first114
Average speedThis ship 11.5 kn · median 10.7 (+7%)
8.8Faster than 83% of bulk carrier ships11.8
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+57%)
4.80Ranks 3,004 of 3,611, lowest first15.9
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports4%
  • From the EU44%
  • Into the EU45%
  • At berth in the EU8%
Fuel burned laden
746 t
84% of all fuel; 16% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
213 t
7.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • LOWLANDS PELIKAAN
  • Bulk carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • LOWLANDS PELIKAAN
  • Bulk carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • LOWLANDS PELIKAAN
  • Bulk carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+1.3 kn−16%−4%−32%+34%1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−1.1 kn+9%−2%+8%+37%1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023+1.0 kn−16%−8%+6%−40%1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−0.6 kn−2%−8%+33%+20%0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+0.2 kn+10%+12%−55%+10%Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+0.8 kn−10%−2%+199%−1%0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−0.9 kn−5%−14%−67%−20%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025COBELFRET NV6922,16311,45699611.560.412.444%
2024part-yearVICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC.1,2123,80116,9671,67110.271.59.2682%
2024COBELFRET NV1,2123,80116,9671,67110.271.59.2682%
2023not published1,0253,21215,6761,38611.365.46.7586%
2022not published1,1493,59014,7231,42310.378.011.280%
2021not published8842,76811,0581,01110.979.99.3484%
2020not published1,7775,57024,5032,28010.772.58.4889%
2019not published6602,0828,1908289.980.68.56100%
2018not published2,1066,62324,7282,27910.885.210.7–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmBulk carrier medianvs Bulk carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025COBELFRET NV12.47.90+57%3,004 of 3,611ABSB+C
2024part-yearVICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC.––––Bureau VeritasB+C
2024COBELFRET NV9.268.09+14%1,937 of 3,089ABSB+C
2023not published6.758.27−18%1,079 of 3,548Bureau VeritasB+C
2022not published11.28.71+28%2,817 of 3,968Bureau VeritasC
2021not published9.348.57+9%2,041 of 3,466Bureau VeritasC
2020not published8.488.24+3%1,654 of 3,150Bureau VeritasC
2019not published8.568.38+2%1,740 of 3,360Bureau VeritasC
2018not published10.78.50+26%2,426 of 3,384Bureau Veritas–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.