Navalyze

Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

MARAN GAS AMPHIPOLIS

IMO
9701217
Type
LNG carrier
Port of registry
Piraeus
Technical efficiency
EIV 6.04 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel
Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MARAN GAS MARITIME INC. · part of Maran

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
196.3 kg/nm
LNG carrier median 190.4 kg/nm (+3%)
CO₂ per transport work (volume)
5.99
g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 7.12 (−16%)
Average speed
15.8 kn
LNG carrier median 14.4 kn (+10%)
Fuel per day at sea
74.3 t/day
Fuel consumed
10,613 t
CO₂ emitted
28,398 t
37,329 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
54,058 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,430 h
143 days, 39% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 196.3 kg/nm · median 190.4 (+3%)
152.1Ranks 215 of 386, lowest first319.4
Average speedThis ship 15.8 kn · median 14.4 (+10%)
11.2Faster than 89% of LNG carrier ships15.9
CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 5.99 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (−16%)
5.06Ranks 137 of 386, lowest first16.14
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU46%
  • Into the EU52%
  • At berth in the EU2%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (14,496 t).

Fuel burned laden
98%
2% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
2.1%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
308.1 t
LNG engines slip unburnt methane
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.314
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • MARAN GAS AMPHIPOLIS
  • LNG carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • MARAN GAS AMPHIPOLIS
  • LNG carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

  • MARAN GAS AMPHIPOLIS
  • LNG carrier median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025−0.2 kn−5%−6%+83%−8%Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024+1.5 kn+29%+43%+109%+78%1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 29%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2023+5.3 kn−47%−17%+112%−63%5.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 47%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019+1.1 kn−7%+5%−19%−64%1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025LNGMARAN GAS MARITIME INC.10,61328,39854,0583,43015.8196.3–98%
2024LNGMARAN GAS MARITIME INC.6,06716,22829,4961,84716.0205.7–100%
2023LNGnot published2,2446,20214,08697514.5159.3––
2019LNGnot published2,0145,5546,6597239.2302.4––
2018LNGnot published2,6977,4508,2601,0148.1326.5––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nmLNG carrier medianvs LNG carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025LNGMARAN GAS MARITIME INC.5.997.12−16%137 of 386ABSA
2024LNGMARAN GAS MARITIME INC.6.527.39−12%129 of 312ABSA
2023LNGnot published3.669.10−60%6 of 355ABSA
2019LNGnot published9.8610.87−9%94 of 248ABSA
2018LNGnot published27.5910.92+153%186 of 197ABSA+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.