Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC LETIZIA

IMO: 9702065
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 55,159 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.01 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 65,741 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

305

Container median 182 kg/nm (+68%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

14.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−28%)

Average speed

17.5 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+27%)

Fuel per day at sea

128.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

19,055 t

CO₂ emitted

59,391 t

Distance sailed

62,434 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,567 h

149 days, 41% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 279 kg/nm · median 177 (+57%)

78.8Ranks 1,853 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.7 kn · median 13.3 (+3%)

9.1Faster than 56% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−3%)

7.22Ranks 1,064 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports16%
From the EU26%
Into the EU55%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,699 t

2.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC LETIZIA
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC LETIZIA
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC LETIZIA
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.2 kn	−3%	−17%	+140%	+15%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+4.0 kn	+31%	+75%	−10%	−26%	4.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 31%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−3.9 kn	−31%	−48%	−68%	+38%	3.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 31%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.7 kn	+4%	−0%	+3%	−1%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.1 kn	+6%	−1%	+88%	+3%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.1 kn	−3%	+3%	−20%	+2%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.0 kn	−1%	−7%	−42%	−11%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	10,935	34,083	39,257	2,864	13.7	279	15.7	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	4,728	14,794	16,378	1,027	15.9	289	13.6	–
2023	not published	4,023	12,787	18,196	1,528	11.9	221	18.6	–
2022	not published	17,983	56,054	56,327	3,565	15.8	319	13.5	–
2021	not published	16,789	52,298	54,606	3,312	16.5	307	13.6	–
2020	not published	8,436	26,404	29,027	1,647	17.6	291	13.1	–
2019	not published	10,948	34,134	36,355	2,204	16.5	301	12.9	–
2018	not published	19,055	59,391	62,434	3,567	17.5	305	14.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	15.7	16.3	−3%	1,064 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	13.6	17.5	−22%	732 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	18.6	19.4	−4%	902 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	13.5	19.1	−30%	595 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	13.6	17.9	−24%	597 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	13.1	17.6	−25%	582 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	12.9	18.9	−32%	501 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	14.5	20.2	−28%	518 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.