Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC ANTONELLA

IMO: 9702273
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 50,011 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.00 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 70,767 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

285

Container median 172 kg/nm (+65%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

12.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−29%)

Average speed

15.8 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

108.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,393 t

CO₂ emitted

47,957 t

Distance sailed

54,084 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,416 h

142 days, 39% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 298 kg/nm · median 177 (+68%)

78.8Ranks 1,965 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.7 kn · median 13.3 (+18%)

9.1Faster than 86% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 18.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+14%)

7.22Ranks 1,263 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports21%
From the EU33%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,048 t

4.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC ANTONELLA
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC ANTONELLA
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC ANTONELLA
Container median

10.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.9 kn	+4%	+10%	−52%	+6%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	+12%	+10%	+29%	−24%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2023	−2.6 kn	−18%	−30%	+108%	+98%	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.8 kn	+9%	+21%	−69%	−7%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	+11%	+15%	+85%	−7%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.8 kn	−14%	−9%	−14%	+17%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	6,417	20,021	21,547	1,374	15.7	298	18.6	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	12,840	40,061	44,990	3,035	14.8	285	17.5	–
2023	not published	8,940	27,849	34,960	2,333	15.0	256	23.0	–
2021	not published	5,219	16,260	16,770	954	17.6	311	11.6	–
2020	not published	15,393	47,957	54,084	3,416	15.8	285	12.5	–
2019	not published	7,467	23,330	29,234	1,898	15.4	255	13.4	–
2018	not published	10,077	31,459	34,039	2,325	14.6	296	11.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	18.6	16.3	+14%	1,263 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	17.5	17.5	−0%	985 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	23.0	19.4	+19%	1,120 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	11.6	17.9	−35%	445 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	12.5	17.6	−29%	543 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	13.4	18.9	−29%	531 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	11.4	20.2	−43%	348 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.