Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

GLOVIS SPLENDOR

IMO: 9702431
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 5,049 t
Flag (estimated): South Korea
Port of registry: Jeju
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.00 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: G-Marine Service Co Ltd

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

123

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

–

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

14.8 kn

Fuel per day at sea

43.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,303 t

CO₂ emitted

7,209 t

Distance sailed

18,755 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,265 h

53 days, 14% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 97.0 kg/nm · median 99.9 (−3%)

79.6Ranks 209 of 506, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 14.5 kn · median 14.4 (+1%)

12.0Faster than 52% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 60.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.4 (+8%)

34.7Ranks 277 of 506, lowest first158

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports6%
From the EU69%
Into the EU21%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

327 t

4.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GLOVIS SPLENDOR
Vehicle carrier median

90.0100.0110.0120.0130.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GLOVIS SPLENDOR
Vehicle carrier median

12.013.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

GLOVIS SPLENDOR
Vehicle carrier median

30.040.050.060.070.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.4 kn	−20%	−27%	+254%	+53%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 20%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+1.1 kn	−1%	+6%	−52%	–	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.1 kn	−4%	−10%	−45%	–	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.7 kn	+10%	+5%	−14%	−22%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	+0%	+5%	+39%	+37%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+3.0 kn	+1%	+25%	+30%	−10%	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.3 kn	−3%	−18%	+19%	+1%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	G-Marine Service Co Ltd	3,099	9,683	31,947	2,210	14.5	97.0	60.0	–
2024	HYUNDAI GLOVIS CO LTD	1,094	3,408	9,030	567	15.9	121	39.4	–
2023	not published	2,303	7,209	18,755	1,265	14.8	123	–	–
2022	not published	4,325	13,517	33,925	2,137	15.9	128	50.0	–
2021	not published	4,552	14,213	39,257	2,368	16.6	116	63.8	–
2020	not published	3,280	10,239	28,297	1,789	15.8	116	46.4	–
2019	not published	2,491	7,765	21,771	1,703	12.8	114	51.5	–
2018	not published	2,151	6,709	18,253	1,206	15.1	118	50.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	G-Marine Service Co Ltd	60.0	55.4	+8%	277 of 506	Korean Register	C
2024	HYUNDAI GLOVIS CO LTD	39.4	55.3	−29%	47 of 335	Korean Register	C
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	Korean Register	C
2022	not published	50.0	57.7	−13%	165 of 463	Korean Register	C
2021	not published	63.8	59.6	+7%	260 of 459	Korean Register	C
2020	not published	46.4	57.3	−19%	107 of 449	Korean Register	C
2019	not published	51.5	59.0	−13%	131 of 426	Korean Register	C
2018	not published	50.9	62.4	−18%	85 of 434	Korean Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.