Navalyze · Passenger · Ship

LE LYRIAL

IMO: 9704130
Type: Passenger ship
Port of registry: Mata Utu
Technical efficiency: EEDI 21.80 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: PONANT

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

76.4 kg/nm

Passenger median 76.3 kg/nm (+0%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

1,507

g CO₂/pax·nm · Passenger median 1,819 (−17%)

Average speed

9.4 kn

Passenger median 9.9 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

614 t

CO₂ emitted

1,969 t

2,000 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

8,039 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

854 h

36 days, 10% of the year

Within the passenger fleet, 2025

Set against all 32 passenger ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 76.4 kg/nm · median 76.3 (+0%)

52.7Ranks 17 of 32, lowest first218.4

Average speedThis ship 9.4 kn · median 9.9 (−5%)

3.9Faster than 44% of passenger ships12.9

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,507.09 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 1,819.16 (−17%)

617.57Ranks 13 of 32, lowest first31,126.52

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Passenger medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports36%
From the EU17%
Into the EU34%
At berth in the EU13%

65% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,287 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

13.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Passenger median is the middle ship of all passenger ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

LE LYRIAL
Passenger median

0.0100.0200.0300.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LE LYRIAL
Passenger median

2.55.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

LE LYRIAL
Passenger median

0.02,0004,0006,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.9 kn	+6%	−11%	−22%	+6%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.7 kn	−9%	+7%	−64%	−14%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+3.1 kn	−3%	+44%	−17%	−27%	3.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.3 kn	−27%	−23%	+67%	−30%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+1.3 kn	−14%	+8%	+48%	−45%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−2.2 kn	+56%	+8%	−54%	+296%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 56%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−3.8 kn	−2%	−36%	+7%	+3%	3.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	PONANT	614	1,969	8,039	854	9.4	76.4	–	–
2024	PONANT	744	2,386	10,343	915	11.3	72.0	–	–
2023	not published	2,270	7,279	28,694	2,985	9.6	79.1	–	–
2022	not published	2,825	9,057	34,490	5,320	6.5	81.9	–	–
2021	not published	2,312	7,412	20,690	3,339	6.2	111.7	–	–
2020	not published	1,816	5,822	13,948	2,850	4.9	130.2	–	–
2019	not published	2,544	8,156	30,429	4,294	7.1	83.6	–	–
2018	not published	2,417	7,577	28,433	2,598	10.9	85.0	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Passenger median	vs Passenger	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	PONANT	1,507.09	1,819.16	−17%	13 of 32	Bureau Veritas	B
2024	PONANT	1,416.94	618.41	+129%	165 of 202	Bureau Veritas	B
2023	not published	1,640.81	625.29	+162%	171 of 202	Bureau Veritas	B
2022	not published	2,262.71	830.76	+172%	169 of 187	Bureau Veritas	B
2021	not published	3,252.96	1,314.88	+147%	87 of 100	Bureau Veritas	B
2020	not published	5,951.01	1,168.55	+409%	79 of 100	Bureau Veritas	B
2019	not published	1,504.50	589.20	+155%	155 of 177	Bureau Veritas	B
2018	not published	1,456.93	577.11	+152%	140 of 153	Bureau Veritas	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Passenger ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's passenger ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.