Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC ELODIE

IMO: 9704972
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 59,925 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.02 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 64,172 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

285

Container median 186 kg/nm (+53%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

13.9

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (−23%)

Average speed

16.2 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (+15%)

Fuel per day at sea

110.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

18,741 t

CO₂ emitted

58,397 t

Distance sailed

65,704 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,059 h

169 days, 46% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 301 kg/nm · median 177 (+70%)

78.8Ranks 1,978 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.8 kn · median 13.3 (+11%)

9.1Faster than 74% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−4%)

7.22Ranks 1,064 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU45%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,260 t

3.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC ELODIE
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC ELODIE
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC ELODIE
Container median

10.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.1 kn	+8%	+16%	−55%	+6%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	+1%	+5%	−15%	+3%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.1 kn	−2%	−9%	−1%	−11%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.9 kn	−1%	−13%	−19%	+17%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.6 kn	−2%	−5%	+82%	−6%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.8 kn	+22%	+37%	−10%	+41%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 22%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+1.4 kn	−8%	+1%	−3%	+3%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	6,120	19,134	20,325	1,374	14.8	301	15.7	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	12,530	39,173	44,791	3,274	13.7	280	14.8	–
2023	not published	14,652	45,667	52,943	4,004	13.2	277	14.4	–
2022	not published	14,966	46,643	53,220	3,734	14.3	281	16.2	–
2021	not published	18,741	58,397	65,704	4,059	16.2	285	13.9	–
2020	not published	10,511	32,748	36,126	2,152	16.8	291	14.7	–
2019	not published	9,536	29,797	40,075	2,668	15.0	238	10.4	–
2018	not published	10,702	33,444	41,169	3,034	13.6	260	10.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	15.7	16.3	−4%	1,064 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	14.8	17.5	−16%	805 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	14.4	19.4	−26%	703 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	16.2	19.1	−15%	777 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	13.9	17.9	−23%	616 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	14.7	17.6	−16%	719 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	10.4	18.9	−45%	354 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	10.1	20.2	−50%	269 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.