Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC JULIE

IMO: 9704996
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 71,921 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.01 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 68,586 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

301

Container median 186 kg/nm (+62%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

13.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (−24%)

Average speed

15.8 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (+12%)

Fuel per day at sea

114.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,909 t

CO₂ emitted

46,444 t

Distance sailed

49,465 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,133 h

131 days, 36% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 307 kg/nm · median 177 (+73%)

78.8Ranks 2,007 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.4 kn · median 13.3 (+16%)

9.1Faster than 81% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−18%)

7.22Ranks 881 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports17%
From the EU40%
Into the EU39%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,965 t

4.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC JULIE
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC JULIE
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC JULIE
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.5 kn	+8%	+19%	−75%	−5%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	+15%	+19%	+33%	+0%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.3 kn	−10%	−18%	+13%	−10%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	−9%	−15%	−35%	+13%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	+8%	+6%	+80%	+13%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−2.0 kn	−11%	−21%	−40%	−12%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.8 kn	+4%	+9%	−20%	−1%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	3,727	11,618	12,146	791	15.4	307	13.3	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	13,798	43,008	48,509	3,493	13.9	284	13.9	–
2023	not published	9,076	28,292	36,585	2,732	13.4	248	13.9	–
2022	not published	8,878	27,661	32,326	2,197	14.7	275	15.5	–
2021	not published	14,909	46,444	49,465	3,133	15.8	301	13.7	–
2020	not published	7,648	23,814	27,519	1,697	16.2	278	12.1	–
2019	not published	14,300	44,566	45,915	2,518	18.2	311	13.8	–
2018	not published	17,162	53,497	57,594	3,303	17.4	298	13.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	13.3	16.3	−18%	881 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	13.9	17.5	−20%	758 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	13.9	19.4	−28%	668 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	15.5	19.1	−19%	737 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	13.7	17.9	−24%	609 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	12.1	17.6	−31%	519 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	13.8	18.9	−27%	554 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	13.8	20.2	−32%	484 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.