Navalyze · Container · Ship

AL NASRIYAH

IMO: 9708849
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 104,667 t
Flag (estimated): Germany
Port of registry: Hamburg
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.37 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Hapag-Lloyd AG

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 77,178 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

219

Container median 174 kg/nm (+26%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.90

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−53%)

Average speed

15.1 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+10%)

Fuel per day at sea

79.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

19,326 t

CO₂ emitted

60,496 t

Distance sailed

88,074 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,851 h

244 days, 67% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 278 kg/nm · median 177 (+57%)

78.8Ranks 1,848 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 16.5 kn · median 13.3 (+24%)

9.1Faster than 94% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.29 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−49%)

7.22Ranks 375 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports6%
From the EU43%
Into the EU49%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,295 t

2.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AL NASRIYAH
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

AL NASRIYAH
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AL NASRIYAH
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2025	+3.6 kn	+18%	+51%	+49%	+34%	3.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.0 kn	−9%	−15%	−9%	−7%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+1.3 kn	+12%	+24%	−2%	+1%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.9 kn	−10%	−27%	+2%	−2%	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	+16%	+19%	−36%	−24%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	−10%	−14%	+2%	+26%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	21,424	66,906	77,109	4,680	16.5	278	8.29	–
2023	not published	12,176	37,320	51,817	4,003	12.9	235	6.20	–
2022	not published	14,677	45,812	56,852	4,099	13.9	258	6.70	–
2021	not published	13,285	41,446	57,780	4,597	12.6	230	6.62	–
2020	not published	14,379	45,347	56,378	3,642	15.5	255	6.77	–
2019	not published	19,326	60,496	88,074	5,851	15.1	219	8.90	–
2018	not published	21,081	65,853	86,252	5,479	15.7	244	7.08	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	8.29	16.3	−49%	375 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	6.20	19.4	−68%	82 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022	not published	6.70	19.1	−65%	106 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	6.62	17.9	−63%	112 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	6.77	17.6	−61%	149 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	8.90	18.9	−53%	254 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	7.08	20.2	−65%	65 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.