Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

MARAN GAS PERICLES

IMO: 9709489
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Greece
Port of registry: Piraeus
Technical efficiency: EIV 6.29 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MARAN GAS MARITIME INC. · part of Maran

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

188

LNG carrier median 252 kg/nm (−26%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

7.01

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.4 (−32%)

Average speed

14.1 kn

LNG carrier median 14.1 kn (+0%)

Fuel per day at sea

63.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,908 t

CO₂ emitted

22,517 t

Distance sailed

42,128 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,982 h

124 days, 34% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 226 kg/nm · median 190 (+19%)

152Ranks 271 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 16.9 kn · median 14.4 (+17%)

11.2Faster than 98% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 3.58 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (−50%)

5.06Ranks 4 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU55%
Into the EU43%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

480 t

2.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MARAN GAS PERICLES
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MARAN GAS PERICLES
LNG carrier median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

MARAN GAS PERICLES
LNG carrier median

0.050.0100150

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+6.0 kn	+17%	+81%	−57%	−40%	6.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−5.4 kn	−3%	−35%	−69%	−9%	5.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+2.2 kn	+6%	+22%	−24%	−7%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.3 kn	−29%	−28%	+137%	−23%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 29%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2021	−0.1 kn	+40%	+40%	+25%	+47%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 40%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.0 kn	−38%	−34%	+56%	−94%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 38%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	MARAN GAS MARITIME INC.	961	2,565	4,244	251	16.9	226	–	100%
2024LNG	MARAN GAS MARITIME INC.	1,905	5,114	9,847	903	10.9	194	–	98%
2023LNG / alt.	not published	6,361	17,526	32,044	1,970	16.3	199	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	7,908	22,517	42,128	2,982	14.1	188	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	4,724	13,527	17,774	1,287	13.8	266	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	2,699	7,437	14,257	1,027	13.9	189	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	2,796	7,799	9,114	707	12.9	307	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	MARAN GAS MARITIME INC.	3.58	7.12	−50%	4 of 386	ABS	A
2024LNG	MARAN GAS MARITIME INC.	5.92	7.39	−20%	100 of 312	ABS	A
2023LNG / alt.	not published	6.52	9.10	−28%	87 of 355	ABS	A
2022LNG / alt.	not published	7.01	10.4	−32%	86 of 379	ABS	A
2021LNG / alt.	not published	9.10	10.5	−13%	121 of 289	ABS	A
2019LNG / alt.	not published	6.19	10.9	−43%	23 of 248	ABS	A
2018LNG / alt.	not published	106	10.9	+875%	197 of 197	ABS	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.