Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC ANZU

IMO: 9710426
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 58,383 t
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.01 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 58,383 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

293.8 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+66%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.70

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−4%)

Average speed

14.1 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

99.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,754 t

CO₂ emitted

39,787 t

40,413 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

43,407 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,069 h

128 days, 35% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 293.8 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+66%)

78.8Ranks 1,943 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 14.1 kn · median 13.3 (+6%)

9.1Faster than 63% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.70 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−4%)

7.22Ranks 1,062 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports20%
From the EU31%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU6%

58% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (22,999 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

6.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.6 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MSC ANZU
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC ANZU
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC ANZU
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	+2%	−0%	−11%	+6%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.4 kn	+16%	+28%	−14%	−4%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.4 kn	−12%	−21%	+21%	+6%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−2.7 kn	−13%	−26%	+34%	+4%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.0 kn	−3%	−8%	−37%	+3%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.4 kn	+9%	+18%	+175%	−11%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.8 kn	+4%	+10%	−63%	+0%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	12,754	39,787	43,407	3,069	14.1	293.8	15.70	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	13,980	43,568	48,680	3,363	14.5	287.2	14.77	–
2023	not published	13,997	43,604	56,310	4,301	13.1	248.6	15.38	–
2022	not published	13,211	41,218	46,608	3,204	14.5	283.4	14.52	–
2021	not published	11,322	35,273	34,908	2,029	17.2	324.3	13.90	–
2020	not published	18,393	57,294	55,077	3,031	18.2	333.9	13.55	–
2019	not published	6,159	19,201	20,056	1,195	16.8	307.1	15.23	–
2018	not published	16,168	50,450	54,882	3,440	16.0	294.6	15.21	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	15.70	16.30	−4%	1,062 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	14.77	17.52	−16%	803 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	15.38	19.40	−21%	752 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	14.52	19.13	−24%	662 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	13.90	17.90	−22%	623 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	13.55	17.58	−23%	625 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	15.23	18.88	−19%	672 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	15.21	20.22	−25%	556 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.