Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC ANZU

IMO: 9710426
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 58,383 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.01 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 50,348 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

249

Container median 165 kg/nm (+51%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (−21%)

Average speed

13.1 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

78.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,997 t

CO₂ emitted

43,604 t

Distance sailed

56,310 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,301 h

179 days, 49% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 294 kg/nm · median 177 (+66%)

78.8Ranks 1,943 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.1 kn · median 13.3 (+6%)

9.1Faster than 63% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−4%)

7.22Ranks 1,062 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports40%
From the EU31%
Into the EU25%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,810 t

4.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC ANZU
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC ANZU
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC ANZU
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	+2%	−0%	−11%	+6%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.4 kn	+16%	+28%	−14%	−4%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.4 kn	−12%	−21%	+21%	+6%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−2.7 kn	−13%	−26%	+34%	+4%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.0 kn	−3%	−8%	−37%	+3%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.4 kn	+9%	+18%	+175%	−11%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.8 kn	+4%	+10%	−63%	+0%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	12,754	39,787	43,407	3,069	14.1	294	15.7	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	13,980	43,568	48,680	3,363	14.5	287	14.8	–
2023	not published	13,997	43,604	56,310	4,301	13.1	249	15.4	–
2022	not published	13,211	41,218	46,608	3,204	14.5	283	14.5	–
2021	not published	11,322	35,273	34,908	2,029	17.2	324	13.9	–
2020	not published	18,393	57,294	55,077	3,031	18.2	334	13.6	–
2019	not published	6,159	19,201	20,056	1,195	16.8	307	15.2	–
2018	not published	16,168	50,450	54,882	3,440	16.0	295	15.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	15.7	16.3	−4%	1,062 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	14.8	17.5	−16%	803 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	15.4	19.4	−21%	752 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	14.5	19.1	−24%	662 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	13.9	17.9	−22%	623 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	13.6	17.6	−23%	625 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	15.2	18.9	−19%	672 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	15.2	20.2	−25%	556 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.