Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

GARGANTUA

IMO: 9712682
Type: Bulk carrier
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 2.13 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Starbulk SA

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

116.9 kg/nm

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

–

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

14.7 kn

Fuel per day at sea

41.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

183 t

CO₂ emitted

572 t

580 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

1,563 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

106 h

4 days, 1% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 3,548 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 147.0 kg/nm · median 86.1 (+71%)

63.6Ranks 3,381 of 3,548, lowest first124.7

Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 10.8 (+4%)

8.8Faster than 65% of bulk carrier ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 3.72 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.27 (−55%)

4.85Ranks 135 of 3,548, lowest first17.36

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU100%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU0%

50% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (286 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

0.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.014

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

GARGANTUA
Bulk carrier median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

GARGANTUA
Bulk carrier median

10.011.012.013.014.015.0

’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	+3.5 kn	−20%	+5%	−77%	–	3.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	Starbulk SA	183	572	1,563	106	14.7	116.9	–	–
2023	not published	1,019	3,178	6,935	620	11.2	147.0	3.72	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	Starbulk SA	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	3.72	8.27	−55%	135 of 3,548	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.