Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC DOMITILLE

IMO: 9720201
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 59,948 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.97 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 84,356 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

362

Container median 186 kg/nm (+95%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

13.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (−25%)

Average speed

16.8 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (+19%)

Fuel per day at sea

145.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

22,020 t

CO₂ emitted

68,646 t

Distance sailed

60,774 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,625 h

151 days, 41% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 283 kg/nm · median 177 (+60%)

78.8Ranks 1,877 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.1 kn · median 13.3 (+6%)

9.1Faster than 62% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−9%)

7.22Ranks 991 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports26%
From the EU27%
Into the EU41%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4,249 t

6.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC DOMITILLE
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC DOMITILLE
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC DOMITILLE
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.0 kn	+5%	+13%	+33%	−6%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.7 kn	+3%	−9%	−8%	+19%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.9 kn	−24%	−28%	−41%	−22%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 24%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	−5%	−11%	+16%	+27%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	+1%	+3%	+270%	−6%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	+31%	+33%	−45%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 31%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.1 kn	+1%	+8%	−61%	+1%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	14,373	45,041	50,835	3,601	14.1	283	14.8	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	10,343	32,492	38,235	2,919	13.1	271	15.8	–
2023	not published	10,933	34,068	41,512	2,811	14.8	263	13.3	–
2022	not published	24,300	75,715	70,397	4,493	15.7	345	17.0	–
2021	not published	22,020	68,646	60,774	3,625	16.8	362	13.4	–
2020	not published	5,916	18,506	16,421	1,002	16.4	360	14.3	–
2019	not published	8,263	25,787	29,961	1,866	16.1	276	14.9	–
2018	not published	21,167	66,094	77,765	5,183	15.0	272	14.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	14.8	16.3	−9%	991 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	15.8	17.5	−10%	869 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	13.3	19.4	−32%	619 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	17.0	19.1	−11%	818 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	13.4	17.9	−25%	581 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	14.3	17.6	−19%	694 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	14.9	18.9	−21%	651 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	14.8	20.2	−27%	539 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.