Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC MAXINE

IMO: 9720287
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 75,263 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.96 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 68,522 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

253

Container median 165 kg/nm (+53%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (−41%)

Average speed

12.1 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (−8%)

Fuel per day at sea

73.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,250 t

CO₂ emitted

35,103 t

Distance sailed

44,470 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,667 h

153 days, 42% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 308 kg/nm · median 177 (+74%)

78.8Ranks 2,011 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.1 kn · median 13.3 (+6%)

9.1Faster than 62% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−21%)

7.22Ranks 850 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports28%
From the EU29%
Into the EU37%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,085 t

5.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC MAXINE
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC MAXINE
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC MAXINE
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.2 kn	+0%	+10%	−32%	+7%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.8 kn	+21%	+29%	+7%	+4%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−3.8 kn	−14%	−34%	−9%	−22%	3.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.3 kn	−15%	−21%	−5%	+11%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	+12%	+17%	+57%	+7%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	−1%	+2%	+12%	−21%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	+4.9 kn	+37%	+96%	+54%	−5%	4.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 37%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	10,025	31,472	32,592	2,307	14.1	308	12.8	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	14,602	45,554	47,589	3,689	12.9	307	12.0	–
2023	not published	11,250	35,103	44,470	3,667	12.1	253	11.5	–
2022	not published	14,338	44,676	48,886	3,075	15.9	293	14.7	–
2021	not published	17,747	55,279	51,683	3,011	17.2	343	13.3	–
2020	not published	10,066	31,376	32,828	2,000	16.4	307	12.5	–
2019	not published	9,024	28,126	29,248	1,820	16.1	309	15.9	–
2018	not published	4,264	13,300	18,967	1,687	11.2	225	16.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	12.8	16.3	−21%	850 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	12.0	17.5	−31%	604 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	11.5	19.4	−41%	494 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	14.7	19.1	−23%	675 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	13.3	17.9	−26%	573 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	12.5	17.6	−29%	539 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	15.9	18.9	−16%	715 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	16.8	20.2	−17%	665 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.