Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC JEONGMIN

IMO: 9720471
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 63,706 t
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.96 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 63,706 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

317.9 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+80%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.58

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−4%)

Average speed

15.0 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

114.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

18,084 t

CO₂ emitted

56,456 t

57,344 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

56,881 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,803 h

158 days, 43% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 317.9 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+80%)

78.8Ranks 2,058 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 15.0 kn · median 13.3 (+13%)

9.1Faster than 76% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.58 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−4%)

7.22Ranks 1,055 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports21%
From the EU36%
Into the EU38%
At berth in the EU5%

63% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (35,610 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.9 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MSC JEONGMIN
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC JEONGMIN
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC JEONGMIN
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.7 kn	+7%	+12%	+34%	+20%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+2.4 kn	+22%	+45%	−1%	−9%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−3.6 kn	−19%	−38%	−23%	−12%	3.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.7 kn	−8%	−17%	+11%	+20%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	+9%	+14%	−19%	+0%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	18,084	56,456	56,881	3,803	15.0	317.9	15.58	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	12,596	39,288	42,453	2,974	14.3	296.7	12.94	–
2023	not published	10,436	32,532	42,759	3,584	11.9	244.1	14.29	–
2022	not published	16,828	52,440	55,775	3,596	15.5	301.7	16.27	–
2021	not published	16,470	51,350	50,246	2,923	17.2	327.8	13.54	–
2020	not published	18,798	58,567	62,296	3,792	16.4	301.8	13.48	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	15.58	16.30	−4%	1,055 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	12.94	17.52	−26%	681 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	14.29	19.40	−26%	693 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	16.27	19.13	−15%	781 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	13.54	17.90	−24%	595 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	13.48	17.58	−23%	616 of 1,797	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.