Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC JEONGMIN

IMO: 9720471
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 63,706 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.96 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 69,743 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

302

Container median 172 kg/nm (+75%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

13.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−23%)

Average speed

16.4 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+17%)

Fuel per day at sea

119.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

18,798 t

CO₂ emitted

58,567 t

Distance sailed

62,296 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,792 h

158 days, 43% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 318 kg/nm · median 177 (+80%)

78.8Ranks 2,058 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.0 kn · median 13.3 (+13%)

9.1Faster than 76% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−4%)

7.22Ranks 1,055 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports32%
From the EU28%
Into the EU33%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3,596 t

6.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC JEONGMIN
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC JEONGMIN
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC JEONGMIN
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.7 kn	+7%	+12%	+34%	+20%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+2.4 kn	+22%	+45%	−1%	−9%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−3.6 kn	−19%	−38%	−23%	−12%	3.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.7 kn	−8%	−17%	+11%	+20%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	+9%	+14%	−19%	+0%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	18,084	56,456	56,881	3,803	15.0	318	15.6	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	12,596	39,288	42,453	2,974	14.3	297	12.9	–
2023	not published	10,436	32,532	42,759	3,584	11.9	244	14.3	–
2022	not published	16,828	52,440	55,775	3,596	15.5	302	16.3	–
2021	not published	16,470	51,350	50,246	2,923	17.2	328	13.5	–
2020	not published	18,798	58,567	62,296	3,792	16.4	302	13.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	15.6	16.3	−4%	1,055 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	12.9	17.5	−26%	681 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	14.3	19.4	−26%	693 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	16.3	19.1	−15%	781 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	13.5	17.9	−24%	595 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	13.5	17.6	−23%	616 of 1,797	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.