Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC CHLOE

IMO: 9720483
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 70,071 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.96 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 71,244 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

333

Container median 186 kg/nm (+79%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

14.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (−19%)

Average speed

16.1 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

128.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

20,794 t

CO₂ emitted

64,790 t

Distance sailed

62,502 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,890 h

162 days, 44% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 292 kg/nm · median 177 (+65%)

78.8Ranks 1,934 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.8 kn · median 13.3 (+11%)

9.1Faster than 73% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−20%)

7.22Ranks 861 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports16%
From the EU36%
Into the EU45%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,073 t

3.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC CHLOE
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC CHLOE
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC CHLOE
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.0 kn	+9%	+16%	+27%	+9%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.8 kn	+10%	+16%	+7%	+11%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−2.1 kn	−26%	−36%	−32%	−25%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 26%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−1.0 kn	−0%	−6%	+1%	−1%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.5 kn	+15%	+11%	+12%	+6%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+4.1 kn	+26%	+67%	+515%	−12%	4.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−4.0 kn	−22%	−41%	−88%	+17%	4.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	16,988	52,955	58,089	3,936	14.8	292	13.0	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	12,319	38,518	45,842	3,323	13.8	269	11.9	–
2023	not published	10,466	32,779	42,840	3,283	13.0	244	10.8	–
2022	not published	20,971	65,374	63,345	4,181	15.1	331	14.4	–
2021	not published	20,794	64,790	62,502	3,890	16.1	333	14.6	–
2020	not published	16,215	50,537	55,992	3,381	16.6	290	13.8	–
2019	not published	2,092	6,549	9,104	728	12.5	230	15.6	–
2018	not published	21,643	67,538	73,108	4,434	16.5	296	13.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	13.0	16.3	−20%	861 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	11.9	17.5	−32%	596 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	10.8	19.4	−44%	442 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	14.4	19.1	−25%	650 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	14.6	17.9	−19%	682 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	13.8	17.6	−22%	643 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	15.6	18.9	−17%	694 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	13.4	20.2	−34%	452 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.