Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC SASHA

IMO: 9720500
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 67,533 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.96 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 64,108 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

276

Container median 178 kg/nm (+55%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

13.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (−30%)

Average speed

14.6 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+7%)

Fuel per day at sea

96.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,035 t

CO₂ emitted

31,315 t

Distance sailed

36,425 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,494 h

104 days, 28% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 292 kg/nm · median 177 (+65%)

78.8Ranks 1,932 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.7 kn · median 13.3 (+18%)

9.1Faster than 86% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−17%)

7.22Ranks 890 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports39%
From the EU18%
Into the EU38%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,619 t

5.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC SASHA
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC SASHA
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC SASHA
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.9 kn	+0%	+7%	−29%	+10%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	+16%	+20%	−8%	−30%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	−9%	−11%	+59%	+30%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−1.8 kn	−13%	−23%	−47%	+1%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	+14%	+16%	+96%	+9%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.8 kn	−9%	−14%	+445%	−26%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	+12%	+13%	−89%	+21%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	10,968	34,170	37,507	2,387	15.7	292	13.5	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	15,436	48,105	52,892	3,581	14.8	292	12.3	–
2023	not published	14,536	45,352	57,750	4,037	14.3	252	17.4	–
2022	not published	10,035	31,315	36,425	2,494	14.6	276	13.4	–
2021	not published	21,648	67,474	68,280	4,156	16.4	317	13.3	–
2020	not published	9,700	30,217	34,867	2,154	16.2	278	12.2	–
2019	not published	1,959	6,109	6,398	375	17.0	306	16.4	–
2018	not published	15,749	49,114	57,773	3,404	17.0	273	13.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	13.5	16.3	−17%	890 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	12.3	17.5	−30%	624 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	17.4	19.4	−10%	841 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	13.4	19.1	−30%	591 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	13.3	17.9	−26%	572 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	12.2	17.6	−31%	521 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	16.4	18.9	−13%	740 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	13.5	20.2	−33%	462 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.