Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC CLEA

IMO: 9720524
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 61,918 t
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.96 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 61,918 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

257.1 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+45%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

12.95

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−21%)

Average speed

14.2 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+7%)

Fuel per day at sea

87.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,461 t

CO₂ emitted

13,914 t

14,133 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

17,353 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,222 h

51 days, 14% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 257.1 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+45%)

78.8Ranks 1,716 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 14.2 kn · median 13.3 (+7%)

9.1Faster than 64% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.95 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−21%)

7.22Ranks 857 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports30%
From the EU47%
Into the EU16%
At berth in the EU7%

69% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (9,559 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

7.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MSC CLEA
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC CLEA
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC CLEA
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	−16%	−14%	−62%	+8%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.5 kn	+19%	+34%	+9%	−22%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−3.8 kn	−16%	−36%	+63%	−0%	3.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	−3%	−4%	+39%	+25%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.8 kn	−3%	−8%	−42%	−11%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.7 kn	+8%	+4%	+5%	+11%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	+3%	+4%	−42%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	4,461	13,914	17,353	1,222	14.2	257.1	12.95	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	13,810	43,173	45,342	3,263	13.9	304.6	12.03	–
2023	not published	10,653	33,427	41,749	3,374	12.4	255.2	15.42	–
2022	not published	7,763	24,191	25,553	1,572	16.2	303.8	15.46	–
2021	not published	5,775	17,986	18,351	1,119	16.4	314.7	12.40	–
2020	not published	10,399	32,387	31,897	1,859	17.2	326.0	13.98	–
2019	not published	9,143	28,506	30,360	1,696	17.9	301.1	12.65	–
2018	not published	15,173	47,332	51,923	2,924	17.8	292.2	13.19	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	12.95	16.30	−21%	857 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	12.03	17.52	−31%	606 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	15.42	19.40	−21%	754 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	15.46	19.13	−19%	735 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	12.40	17.90	−31%	493 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	13.98	17.58	−20%	667 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	12.65	18.88	−33%	486 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	13.19	20.22	−35%	442 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.