Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

SEAPEAK VANCOUVER

IMO: 9721401
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Bahamas
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3.17 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG
Former names: TORBEN SPIRIT

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Seapeak Maritime Limited · part of Seapeak

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

213

LNG carrier median 257 kg/nm (−17%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

8.04

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.5 (−23%)

Average speed

16.8 kn

LNG carrier median 14.6 kn (+15%)

Fuel per day at sea

85.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,493 t

CO₂ emitted

26,477 t

Distance sailed

44,601 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,660 h

111 days, 30% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 203 kg/nm · median 190 (+7%)

152Ranks 237 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 14.8 kn · median 14.4 (+3%)

11.2Faster than 59% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 5.60 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (−21%)

5.06Ranks 97 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU44%
Into the EU55%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

381 t

1.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SEAPEAK VANCOUVER
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’192019’202020’212021’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

SEAPEAK VANCOUVER
LNG carrier median

12.014.016.018.0

’192019’202020’212021’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

SEAPEAK VANCOUVER
LNG carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’192019’202020’212021’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2025	+2.7 kn	+3%	+25%	+304%	−33%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2023	−4.7 kn	−7%	−33%	−66%	+4%	4.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	+2%	+0%	−10%	−4%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	+5%	+8%	−10%	+29%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Seapeak Maritime Limited	12,273	33,938	60,412	4,087	14.8	203	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	2,962	8,202	14,971	1,233	12.1	198	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	9,493	26,477	44,601	2,660	16.8	213	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	10,352	28,845	49,780	2,918	17.1	208	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	11,002	30,652	55,372	3,339	16.6	199	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Seapeak Maritime Limited	5.60	7.12	−21%	97 of 386	DNV	A+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	8.39	9.10	−8%	162 of 355	DNV	A+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	8.04	10.5	−23%	97 of 289	DNV	A+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	8.34	10.7	−22%	65 of 267	DNV	A+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	6.47	10.9	−40%	26 of 248	DNV	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.