Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

TERNFJORD

IMO: 9722405
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 6,619 t
Port of registry: Skagen
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.79 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Terntank Rederi A/S

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,619 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

59.4 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−25%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

27.26

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+81%)

Average speed

11.7 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

16.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,959 t

CO₂ emitted

12,026 t

12,823 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

66,647 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,673 h

236 days, 65% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 59.4 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−25%)

52.8Ranks 241 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 11.7 kn · median 11.1 (+5%)

8.8Faster than 72% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 27.26 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+81%)

7.93Ranks 1,132 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports90%
From the EU1%
Into the EU1%
At berth in the EU8%

99% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (11,896 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

7.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

22.6 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.066

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

TERNFJORD
Chemical tanker median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TERNFJORD
Chemical tanker median

10.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

TERNFJORD
Chemical tanker median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	+2%	+4%	−6%	+0%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.6 kn	−3%	−7%	−1%	−0%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	−2%	+4%	+29%	−2%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.3 kn	−8%	−5%	−1%	−11%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.9 kn	+4%	−4%	−14%	+7%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.5 kn	−9%	+3%	+0%	−5%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.5 kn	+8%	+4%	−4%	−2%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Terntank Rederi A/S	3,959	12,026	66,647	5,673	11.7	59.4	27.26	–
2024LNG	Terntank Rederi A/S	4,124	12,032	70,887	6,132	11.6	58.2	27.18	–
2023	not published	4,271	12,668	71,512	5,882	12.2	59.7	27.31	–
2022	not published	3,379	10,314	55,265	4,863	11.4	61.1	27.97	–
2021	not published	3,679	10,988	55,637	5,022	11.1	66.1	31.38	–
2020LNG	not published	4,097	11,908	64,691	5,382	12.0	63.3	29.45	–
2019LNG	not published	4,504	13,105	64,390	6,115	10.5	69.9	30.86	–
2018LNG	not published	4,372	12,695	67,296	6,138	11.0	65.0	31.50	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Terntank Rederi A/S	27.26	15.04	+81%	1,132 of 1,460	DNV	C
2024LNG	Terntank Rederi A/S	27.18	16.73	+62%	940 of 1,274	DNV	C
2023	not published	27.31	16.23	+68%	984 of 1,314	DNV	C
2022	not published	27.97	16.06	+74%	1,098 of 1,409	DNV	C
2021	not published	31.38	16.69	+88%	1,082 of 1,343	DNV	C
2020LNG	not published	29.45	16.16	+82%	1,040 of 1,312	DNV	C
2019LNG	not published	30.86	17.32	+78%	1,052 of 1,321	DNV	C
2018LNG	not published	31.50	17.14	+84%	1,043 of 1,294	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.