Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM ARKANSAS

IMO: 9722651
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 72,591 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.30 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 80,001 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

283

Container median 178 kg/nm (+59%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (−42%)

Average speed

14.5 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+7%)

Fuel per day at sea

98.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,237 t

CO₂ emitted

47,736 t

Distance sailed

53,853 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,711 h

155 days, 42% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,899 container ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 265 kg/nm · median 165 (+60%)

77.6Ranks 1,593 of 1,899, lowest first291

Average speedThis ship 16.2 kn · median 13.2 (+23%)

10.0Faster than 96% of container ships15.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 19.4 (−41%)

7.34Ranks 486 of 1,899, lowest first51.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU41%
Into the EU52%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

14,628 t

96% of all fuel; 4% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,976 t

4.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM ARKANSAS
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM ARKANSAS
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM ARKANSAS
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2023	+1.7 kn	−6%	+5%	−39%	+3%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.2 kn	−0%	−13%	−10%	−15%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+5.2 kn	+30%	+89%	+383%	+58%	5.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 30%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.0 kn	−3%	−11%	−6%	−70%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	−6%	−5%	+76%	+132%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2023	not published	8,695	27,203	32,844	2,022	16.2	265	11.4	94%
2022	not published	15,237	47,736	53,853	3,711	14.5	283	11.1	96%
2021	not published	16,998	53,245	59,852	3,588	16.7	284	13.1	97%
2020	not published	2,707	8,550	12,386	1,081	11.5	219	8.30	100%
2019	not published	2,952	9,220	13,113	1,047	12.5	225	27.6	94%
2018	not published	1,780	5,556	7,432	598	12.4	240	11.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023	not published	11.4	19.4	−41%	486 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	11.1	19.1	−42%	409 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	13.1	17.9	−27%	559 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	8.30	17.6	−53%	248 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	27.6	18.9	+46%	1,194 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	11.9	20.2	−41%	377 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.