Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

MINERVA TYCHI

IMO: 9723291
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 14,240 t
Port of registry: Piraeus
Technical efficiency: EEDI 4.72 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IB

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Minerva Marine Inc · part of Minerva

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 14,240 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

114.1 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+43%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

25.28

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+68%)

Average speed

9.2 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−17%)

Fuel per day at sea

25.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,443 t

CO₂ emitted

14,022 t

14,240 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

38,951 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,225 h

176 days, 48% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 114.1 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+43%)

52.8Ranks 1,342 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 9.2 kn · median 11.1 (−17%)

8.8Faster than 14% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 25.28 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+68%)

7.93Ranks 1,089 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports80%
From the EU2%
Into the EU2%
At berth in the EU16%

84% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (11,847 t).

Fuel burned laden

51%

49% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

16.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MINERVA TYCHI
Chemical tanker median

70.080.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MINERVA TYCHI
Chemical tanker median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MINERVA TYCHI
Chemical tanker median

15.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+3%	+4%	+38%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	+31%	+32%	−30%	+71%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 31%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.1 kn	−18%	−16%	−4%	−24%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	+12%	+10%	−21%	+22%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.9 kn	−7%	+3%	+18%	+2%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.8 kn	−4%	−21%	+3%	−11%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.1 kn	−3%	+9%	−14%	+1%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Minerva Marine Inc	4,443	14,022	38,951	4,225	9.2	114.1	25.28	51%
2024	Minerva Marine Inc	3,115	9,773	28,219	3,080	9.2	110.4	27.25	49%
2023	not published	3,379	10,676	40,073	4,407	9.1	84.3	15.93	–
2022	not published	4,266	13,575	41,719	4,658	9.0	102.2	20.90	–
2021	not published	4,807	15,335	52,679	5,759	9.1	91.2	17.10	–
2020	not published	4,388	14,068	44,551	5,423	8.2	98.5	16.71	–
2019	not published	4,439	14,162	43,115	4,309	10.0	103.0	18.77	–
2018	not published	5,324	16,837	50,369	5,655	8.9	105.7	18.67	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Minerva Marine Inc	25.28	15.04	+68%	1,089 of 1,460	ABS	A
2024	Minerva Marine Inc	27.25	16.73	+63%	941 of 1,274	ABS	A
2023	not published	15.93	16.23	−2%	637 of 1,314	RINA	A
2022	not published	20.90	16.06	+30%	926 of 1,409	RINA	A
2021	not published	17.10	16.69	+2%	702 of 1,343	RINA	A
2020	not published	16.71	16.16	+3%	691 of 1,312	RINA	A
2019	not published	18.77	17.32	+8%	745 of 1,321	RINA	A
2018	not published	18.67	17.14	+9%	735 of 1,294	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.