Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

SEA FRACTUS

IMO: 9724609
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 30,684 t
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEDI 5.15 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: BRITISH SEAFARER, MAERSK SEAFARER

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Pantheon Tankers Management Ltd

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 25,902 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

94.2

Chemical tanker median 90.2 kg/nm (+4%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 17.1 (−33%)

Average speed

9.2 kn

Chemical tanker median 10.1 kn (−9%)

Fuel per day at sea

20.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,406 t

CO₂ emitted

13,819 t

Distance sailed

46,759 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,081 h

212 days, 58% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 84.1 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+6%)

52.8Ranks 845 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 10.8 kn · median 11.1 (−3%)

8.8Faster than 42% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.60 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (−43%)

7.93Ranks 219 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU48%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

423 t

3.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SEA FRACTUS
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’212021’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SEA FRACTUS
Chemical tanker median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’212021’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SEA FRACTUS
Chemical tanker median

7.510.012.515.017.520.0

’182018’192019’212021’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.3 kn	−3%	+11%	−79%	−20%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.7 kn	+4%	−12%	+109%	+9%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2023	−1.3 kn	−3%	−14%	+316%	+5%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2021	+1.3 kn	−36%	−28%	−85%	−47%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 36%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+2.0 kn	+42%	+74%	−28%	+55%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 42%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Pantheon Tankers Management Ltd	770	2,417	9,159	846	10.8	84.1	8.60	83%
2024	Pantheon Tankers Management Ltd	3,779	11,907	43,792	4,602	9.5	86.3	10.8	59%
2023	not published	1,741	5,484	20,917	1,863	11.2	83.3	9.93	70%
2021	not published	434	1,353	5,028	401	12.5	86.3	9.44	–
2019	not published	4,524	14,151	33,738	3,002	11.2	134	17.7	–
2018	not published	4,406	13,819	46,759	5,081	9.2	94.2	11.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Pantheon Tankers Management Ltd	8.60	15.0	−43%	219 of 1,460	ABS	A
2024	Pantheon Tankers Management Ltd	10.8	16.7	−35%	303 of 1,274	ABS	A
2023	not published	9.93	16.2	−39%	201 of 1,314	ABS	–
2021	not published	9.44	16.7	−43%	129 of 1,343	ABS	B+C
2019	not published	17.7	17.3	+2%	683 of 1,321	ABS	–
2018	not published	11.4	17.1	−33%	283 of 1,294	ABS	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.