Navalyze

Navalyze · Passenger · Ship

VIKING SUN

IMO
9725433
Type
Passenger ship
Flag (estimated)
Norway
Port of registry
Bergen
Technical efficiency
EIV 9.20 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IC
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
268
Passenger median 277 kg/nm (−3%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
953
g CO₂/pax·nm · Passenger median 589 (+62%)
Average speed
10.0 kn
Passenger median 12.9 kn (−22%)
Fuel per day at sea
64.3 t/day
Fuel consumed
7,555 t
CO₂ emitted
23,637 t
Distance sailed
28,145 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,821 h
118 days, 32% of the year

Within the passenger fleet, 2020

Set against all 100 passenger ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 531 kg/nm · median 339 (+56%)
117Ranks 78 of 100, lowest first808
Average speedThis ship 3.2 kn · median 11.0 (−71%)
5.2Faster than 3% of passenger ships16.8
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 108,843 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 1,169 (+9,214%)
334Ranks 93 of 100, lowest first74,157
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Passenger medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports76%
  • From the EU9%
  • Into the EU1%
  • At berth in the EU14%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
3,215 t
13.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Passenger median is the middle ship of all passenger ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • VIKING SUN
  • Passenger median

Average speed, kn

  • VIKING SUN
  • Passenger median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • VIKING SUN
  • Passenger median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2019→2020−6.8 kn+98%−37%−66%+11,323%6.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 98%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019+2.6 kn+51%+105%−37%+55%2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 51%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2020not published5,15216,4119,7103,0303.2531––
2019not published7,55523,63728,1452,82110.0268––
2018not published7,88024,63044,4726,0437.4177––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmPassenger medianvs PassengerRankVerifierMethods
2020not published108,8431,169+9,214%93 of 100DNVC
2019not published953589+62%127 of 177DNVC
2018not published614577+6%84 of 153DNVC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Passenger ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's passenger ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.