Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

MAERSK SALTORO

IMO
9725706
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
82,762 t
Port of registry
Singapore
Technical efficiency
EEDI 9.17 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SYNERGY MARITIME PRIVATE LIMITED · part of Synergy Marine

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 82,762 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
207.2 kg/nm
Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+17%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
7.82
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−52%)
Average speed
15.4 kn
Container median 13.3 kn (+16%)
Fuel per day at sea
76.5 t/day
Fuel consumed
2,980 t
CO₂ emitted
9,307 t
9,454 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
14,381 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
935 h
39 days, 11% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 207.2 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+17%)
78.8Ranks 1,325 of 2,208, lowest first302.4
Average speedThis ship 15.4 kn · median 13.3 (+16%)
9.1Faster than 82% of container ships16.0
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.82 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−52%)
7.22Ranks 316 of 2,208, lowest first46.89
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports6%
  • From the EU7%
  • Into the EU86%
  • At berth in the EU1%

0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
0.8%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.2 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • MAERSK SALTORO
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • MAERSK SALTORO
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • MAERSK SALTORO
  • Container median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2023→2025−2.2 kn−22%−32%+106%−60%2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 22%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2023+1.4 kn+14%+24%−68%+85%1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019−2.2 kn−1%−13%+39%+20%2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025part-yearSYNERGY MARITIME PRIVATE LIMITED2,9809,30714,38193515.4207.27.82–
2025SYNERGY PACIFIC PRIVATE LIMITED2,9809,30714,38193515.4207.27.82–
2023not published1,8595,8056,99639717.6265.719.39–
2019not published5,14716,02822,1231,36716.2232.610.48–
2018not published3,74611,66815,96586718.4234.78.75–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2025part-yearSYNERGY MARITIME PRIVATE LIMITED––––ClassNKC
2025SYNERGY PACIFIC PRIVATE LIMITED7.8216.30−52%316 of 2,208ClassNKB+C
2023not published19.3919.40−0%948 of 1,899ClassNKA
2019not published10.4818.88−44%356 of 1,788ClassNKA+B
2018not published8.7520.22−57%181 of 1,705ClassNKA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

MAERSK SALTORO (IMO 9725706): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2025 | Navalyze