Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

ELISA

IMO: 9730232
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 45,927 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.03 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Lemissoler Shipmanagement Ltd

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 45,927 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

80.7 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−2%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

5.50

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (−30%)

Average speed

8.5 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−21%)

Fuel per day at sea

16.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

510 t

CO₂ emitted

1,596 t

1,621 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

6,319 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

740 h

31 days, 8% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 80.7 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−2%)

61.0Ranks 1,668 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 8.5 kn · median 10.7 (−21%)

8.8Faster than 8% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 5.50 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (−30%)

4.80Ranks 639 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU19%
Into the EU73%
At berth in the EU5%

54% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (865 t).

Fuel burned laden

76%

24% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

5.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ELISA
Bulk carrier median

80.085.090.095.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

ELISA
Bulk carrier median

7.08.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ELISA
Bulk carrier median

5.06.07.08.09.010.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2025	−1.5 kn	−10%	−24%	−61%	−19%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.2 kn	−2%	−13%	−22%	+6%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	+0%	−5%	+208%	+7%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.7 kn	+1%	+7%	−51%	−34%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+3.2 kn	+14%	+60%	+105%	+7%	3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.7 kn	−7%	−37%	−25%	+46%	3.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Lemissoler Shipmanagement Ltd	510	1,596	6,319	740	8.5	80.7	5.50	76%
2023	not published	1,453	4,539	16,147	1,615	10.0	90.0	6.83	–
2022	not published	1,913	5,978	20,775	1,861	11.2	92.1	6.44	–
2021	not published	619	1,941	6,744	572	11.8	91.7	6.00	–
2020	not published	1,244	3,926	13,659	1,228	11.1	91.1	9.08	–
2019	not published	534	1,672	6,663	845	7.9	80.2	8.49	59%
2018	not published	767	2,414	8,867	762	11.6	86.5	5.80	92%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Lemissoler Shipmanagement Ltd	5.50	7.89	−30%	639 of 3,610	ABS	A+B+C
2023	not published	6.83	8.27	−17%	1,107 of 3,548	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	6.44	8.71	−26%	885 of 3,968	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	6.00	8.57	−30%	586 of 3,466	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	9.08	8.24	+10%	1,896 of 3,150	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	8.49	8.38	+1%	1,717 of 3,360	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	5.80	8.50	−32%	585 of 3,384	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.