Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

CHEM SPARK

IMO: 9731743
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 18,264 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.09 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: NAVIG8 SPARK, HAFNIA SPARK

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TB Marine Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 18,264 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

70.1 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−12%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

12.08

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (−20%)

Average speed

11.0 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

18.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,563 t

CO₂ emitted

8,070 t

8,196 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

36,579 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,336 h

139 days, 38% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 70.1 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−12%)

52.8Ranks 499 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 11.0 kn · median 11.1 (−1%)

8.8Faster than 46% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.08 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (−20%)

7.93Ranks 508 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports18%
From the EU29%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU6%

60% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,872 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CHEM SPARK
Chemical tanker median

50.060.070.080.090.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CHEM SPARK
Chemical tanker median

8.09.010.011.012.013.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CHEM SPARK
Chemical tanker median

5.07.510.012.515.017.5

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	+17%	+14%	+11%	+27%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	−10%	−12%	+20%	−40%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	+32%	+23%	+279%	+118%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 32%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+3.3 kn	−29%	−3%	−33%	−49%	3.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 29%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−3.2 kn	−12%	−35%	−8%	+24%	3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	TB Marine Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG	2,563	8,070	36,579	3,336	11.0	70.1	12.08	–
2024	TB Marine Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG	1,977	6,200	32,936	2,955	11.1	60.0	9.50	–
2023	not published	1,822	5,719	27,414	2,399	11.4	66.5	15.95	–
2022	not published	365	1,152	7,241	593	12.2	50.5	7.33	99%
2021	not published	772	2,428	10,834	1,214	8.9	71.2	14.40	82%
2020	not published	956	3,023	11,752	969	12.1	81.3	11.63	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	TB Marine Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG	12.08	15.04	−20%	508 of 1,460	DNV	B+C
2024	TB Marine Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG	9.50	16.73	−43%	206 of 1,274	DNV	A+C
2023	not published	15.95	16.23	−2%	640 of 1,314	DNV	A+C
2022	not published	7.33	16.06	−54%	38 of 1,409	ABS	A+C
2021	not published	14.40	16.69	−14%	520 of 1,343	ABS	A+B
2020	not published	11.63	16.16	−28%	299 of 1,312	ABS	A+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.