Navalyze · Container · Ship

UMM QARN

IMO: 9732333
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 108,508 t
Flag (estimated): Germany
Port of registry: Hamburg
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.38 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Hapag-Lloyd AG

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 107,258 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

252

Container median 174 kg/nm (+45%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.36

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−61%)

Average speed

14.9 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+9%)

Fuel per day at sea

90.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

23,501 t

CO₂ emitted

73,526 t

Distance sailed

93,140 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,232 h

260 days, 71% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 251 kg/nm · median 177 (+42%)

78.8Ranks 1,660 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 16.1 kn · median 13.3 (+21%)

9.1Faster than 91% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.25 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−56%)

7.22Ranks 227 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports6%
From the EU47%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,948 t

2.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

UMM QARN
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0275.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

UMM QARN
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

UMM QARN
Container median

0.05.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2025	+3.4 kn	+19%	+51%	+251%	+46%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−14%	−14%	−42%	−24%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	+1%	+5%	−35%	−3%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−3.7 kn	−2%	−24%	−28%	−10%	3.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.1 kn	−2%	+4%	−23%	+1%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	+8%	+2%	+14%	+5%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	17,168	53,790	68,376	4,242	16.1	251	7.25	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	4,113	10,888	19,483	1,534	12.7	211	4.98	–
2022	not published	8,310	24,914	33,870	2,651	12.8	245	6.54	–
2021	not published	12,523	39,173	51,716	4,213	12.3	242	6.72	–
2020	not published	17,739	55,933	72,077	4,519	16.0	246	7.46	–
2019	not published	23,501	73,526	93,140	6,232	14.9	252	7.36	–
2018	not published	19,033	59,458	81,383	5,171	15.7	234	7.01	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	7.25	16.3	−56%	227 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	4.98	19.4	−74%	8 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022	not published	6.54	19.1	−66%	89 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	6.72	17.9	−62%	119 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	7.46	17.6	−58%	201 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	7.36	18.9	−61%	148 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	7.01	20.2	−65%	56 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.