Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

MARQUETTE

IMO: 9732785
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 21,366 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEDI 5.15 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: TRF MARQUETTE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: INTERUNITY MANAGEMENT CORPORATION SA

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 21,366 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

83.3 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+5%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

12.17

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (−19%)

Average speed

12.1 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (+9%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,362 t

CO₂ emitted

7,373 t

7,489 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

28,353 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,347 h

98 days, 27% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 83.3 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+5%)

52.8Ranks 818 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 12.1 kn · median 11.1 (+9%)

8.8Faster than 82% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.17 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (−19%)

7.93Ranks 515 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports9%
From the EU34%
Into the EU53%
At berth in the EU4%

57% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,178 t).

Fuel burned laden

73%

27% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

4.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MARQUETTE
Chemical tanker median

70.080.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MARQUETTE
Chemical tanker median

10.010.511.011.512.012.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MARQUETTE
Chemical tanker median

8.010.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	−28%	−27%	−11%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 28%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	+34%	+37%	+59%	+4%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 34%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.1 kn	−16%	−15%	−25%	+6%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+1.1 kn	+22%	+35%	+46%	−6%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 22%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	−11%	−14%	−15%	−27%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.9 kn	+14%	+5%	−7%	+74%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	−10%	−12%	−5%	−44%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	INTERUNITY MANAGEMENT CORPORATION SA	2,362	7,373	28,353	2,347	12.1	83.3	12.17	73%
2024part-year	Anglo Eastern Ship Management Pte. Ltd	2,807	8,757	27,644	2,340	11.8	101.5	10.17	–
2024	INTERUNITY MANAGEMENT CORPORATION SA	3,713	11,594	31,910	2,691	11.9	116.4	12.34	–
2023	not published	1,741	5,435	20,079	1,737	11.6	86.7	11.86	63%
2022	not published	2,753	8,599	26,617	2,318	11.5	103.4	11.22	76%
2021	not published	1,541	4,838	18,222	1,752	10.4	84.6	11.97	84%
2020	not published	2,040	6,471	21,485	2,009	10.7	94.9	16.51	71%
2019	not published	1,914	6,004	23,063	1,980	11.6	83.0	9.48	96%
2018	not published	2,220	6,946	24,151	2,023	11.9	91.9	16.99	62%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	INTERUNITY MANAGEMENT CORPORATION SA	12.17	15.04	−19%	515 of 1,460	ICS Verification Services	A
2024part-year	Anglo Eastern Ship Management Pte. Ltd	–	–	–	–	ABS	B+C
2024	INTERUNITY MANAGEMENT CORPORATION SA	12.34	16.73	−26%	419 of 1,274	ICS Verification Services	A
2023	not published	11.86	16.23	−27%	348 of 1,314	ABS	B+C
2022	not published	11.22	16.06	−30%	330 of 1,409	ABS	B+C
2021	not published	11.97	16.69	−28%	326 of 1,343	ABS	B+C
2020	not published	16.51	16.16	+2%	677 of 1,312	ABS	B+C
2019	not published	9.48	17.32	−45%	143 of 1,321	ABS	B+C
2018	not published	16.99	17.14	−1%	633 of 1,294	ABS	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.