Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

CELSIUS MIDDELFART

IMO: 9733349
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 6,650 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEDI 7.23 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: TRF KASHIMA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Feeder 7 LLC

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,650 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

60.6 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−24%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

28.51

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+90%)

Average speed

10.7 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−4%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,140 t

CO₂ emitted

9,821 t

9,975 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

51,799 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,854 h

202 days, 55% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 60.6 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−24%)

52.8Ranks 269 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 10.7 kn · median 11.1 (−4%)

8.8Faster than 38% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 28.51 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+90%)

7.93Ranks 1,150 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports56%
From the EU28%
Into the EU10%
At berth in the EU7%

66% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,489 t).

Fuel burned laden

55%

45% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

6.7%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CELSIUS MIDDELFART
Chemical tanker median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CELSIUS MIDDELFART
Chemical tanker median

10.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CELSIUS MIDDELFART
Chemical tanker median

10.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.5 kn	−16%	−21%	+266%	+98%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	−14%	−17%	−49%	−41%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	+47%	+39%	+61%	+119%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 47%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	−6%	−2%	+57%	−39%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+1.0 kn	−13%	−4%	−20%	+29%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	+17%	+12%	+47%	−32%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	+9%	+3%	−23%	+90%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Feeder 7 LLC	3,140	9,821	51,799	4,854	10.7	60.6	28.51	55%
2024part-year	Anglo Eastern Ship Management Pte. Ltd	40	129	12	3	4.4	3,341.7	562.32	–
2024	Feeder 7 LLC	1,026	3,212	14,160	1,260	11.2	72.5	14.39	80%
2023	not published	2,362	7,408	27,967	2,418	11.6	84.5	24.46	63%
2022	not published	1,001	3,123	17,401	1,426	12.2	57.5	11.18	95%
2021	not published	679	2,120	11,115	948	11.7	61.1	18.25	47%
2020	not published	977	3,045	13,971	1,301	10.7	69.9	14.12	76%
2019	not published	569	1,791	9,531	848	11.2	59.7	20.62	71%
2018	not published	680	2,130	12,435	1,038	12.0	54.7	10.83	96%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Feeder 7 LLC	28.51	15.04	+90%	1,150 of 1,460	ABS	B+C
2024part-year	Anglo Eastern Ship Management Pte. Ltd	–	–	–	–	ABS	B+C
2024	Feeder 7 LLC	14.39	16.73	−14%	533 of 1,274	ABS	B+C
2023	not published	24.46	16.23	+51%	920 of 1,314	ABS	C
2022	not published	11.18	16.06	−30%	325 of 1,409	ABS	C
2021	not published	18.25	16.69	+9%	771 of 1,343	ABS	C
2020	not published	14.12	16.16	−13%	500 of 1,312	ABS	C
2019	not published	20.62	17.32	+19%	830 of 1,321	ABS	C
2018	not published	10.83	17.14	−37%	233 of 1,294	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.