Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

SLOGEN

IMO: 9733375
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 11,376 t
Port of registry: Bergen
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.13 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: TRF KRISTIANSAND

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CHEM TANK SHIPPING XII AS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 11,376 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

63.5 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−20%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

17.47

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+16%)

Average speed

11.3 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,766 t

CO₂ emitted

8,655 t

8,791 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

43,554 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,853 h

161 days, 44% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 63.5 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−20%)

52.8Ranks 343 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 11.3 kn · median 11.1 (+2%)

8.8Faster than 56% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 17.47 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+16%)

7.93Ranks 847 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports45%
From the EU11%
Into the EU39%
At berth in the EU5%

59% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,104 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

SLOGEN
Chemical tanker median

40.060.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SLOGEN
Chemical tanker median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SLOGEN
Chemical tanker median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.5 kn	+19%	+14%	+46%	−53%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+5.7 kn	−54%	−11%	+292%	−44%	5.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 54%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−7.7 kn	+77%	−22%	−78%	+292%	7.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 77%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.4 kn	−4%	+7%	+65%	−5%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.2 kn	+5%	−5%	+53%	−23%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	−6%	−4%	+62%	−9%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.0 kn	−31%	−25%	+1,745%	−7%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 31%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	CHEM TANK SHIPPING XII AS	2,766	8,655	43,554	3,853	11.3	63.5	17.47	–
2024part-year	FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED	979	3,053	17,153	1,467	11.7	57.1	–	–
2024	CHEM TANK SHIPPING XII AS	1,595	4,980	29,796	2,527	11.8	53.5	37.36	–
2023	not published	878	2,756	7,601	1,244	6.1	115.5	67.26	–
2022	not published	2,293	7,201	35,202	2,545	13.8	65.2	17.16	–
2021	not published	1,449	4,583	21,286	1,722	12.4	68.1	18.06	–
2020	not published	903	2,829	13,875	1,023	13.6	65.1	23.56	–
2019	not published	595	1,854	8,562	646	13.3	69.5	26.01	–
2018	not published	46	145	464	38	12.3	100.0	27.95	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CHEM TANK SHIPPING XII AS	17.47	15.04	+16%	847 of 1,460	DNV	B+C
2024part-year	FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2024	CHEM TANK SHIPPING XII AS	37.36	16.73	+123%	1,091 of 1,274	DNV	A+C
2023	not published	67.26	16.23	+314%	1,281 of 1,314	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	17.16	16.06	+7%	761 of 1,409	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	18.06	16.69	+8%	761 of 1,343	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	23.56	16.16	+46%	945 of 1,312	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	26.01	17.32	+50%	976 of 1,321	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	27.95	17.14	+63%	991 of 1,294	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.