Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

EPIC SHIKOKU

IMO: 9733545
Type: Gas carrier
Average cargo carried: 1 t
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.50 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: BW Epic Kosan Maritime Pte. Ltd. · part of BW Group

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 1 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

65.0 kg/nm

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

206,739

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

7.9 kn

Fuel per day at sea

12.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

532 t

CO₂ emitted

1,691 t

1,717 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

8,178 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,033 h

43 days, 12% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2023

Set against all 330 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 56.1 kg/nm · median 83.3 (−33%)

53.6Ranks 44 of 330, lowest first129.1

Average speedThis ship 12.8 kn · median 12.8 (+0%)

10.1Faster than 51% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 45.41 g CO₂/t·nm · median 41.77 (+9%)

15.26Ranks 179 of 330, lowest first131.00

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports32%
From the EU19%
Into the EU45%
At berth in the EU3%

68% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,149 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

EPIC SHIKOKU
Gas carrier (LPG) median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

EPIC SHIKOKU
Gas carrier (LPG) median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EPIC SHIKOKU
Gas carrier (LPG) median

20.040.060.080.0100

’192019’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2025	−4.9 kn	+16%	−29%	+145%	–	4.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.9 kn	+1%	−4%	−93%	+15%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.4 kn	−5%	−3%	+142%	−17%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2021	+6.1 kn	−6%	+75%	−43%	−47%	6.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	–	–	–	–	–

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	BW Epic Kosan Maritime Pte. Ltd.	532	1,691	8,178	1,033	7.9	65.0	206,739.11	–
2023	not published	187	589	3,338	260	12.8	56.1	45.41	–
2022	not published	2,569	8,039	46,419	3,399	13.7	55.3	39.48	–
2021	not published	1,121	3,516	19,212	1,443	13.3	58.4	47.52	–
2019	not published	2,089	6,531	33,551	4,677	7.2	62.3	89.40	–
2018	not published	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Gas carrier (LPG) median	vs Gas carrier (LPG)	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	BW Epic Kosan Maritime Pte. Ltd.	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	A
2023	not published	45.41	41.77	+9%	179 of 330	Lloyd's Register	A
2022	not published	39.48	42.53	−7%	167 of 348	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	47.52	46.91	+1%	164 of 323	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	89.40	45.85	+95%	251 of 331	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.