Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

BW Group
Ships78
CO₂ emitted649 kt−3.4%
Fuel per mile123 kg/nm
Average speed11.2 kn
CO₂ at berth5.2%
Ships burning LNG18
Main segmentLNG carrier

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

LNG carrier

CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 7.1

  • BW Group10.1 (+42%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
BW Group1910.1+42%22512.52,5052.6%17
Segment median 7.10%

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0

  • BW Group8.0 (0%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
BW Group288.00%10310.61,6779.7%1
Segment median 8.00%

Gas carrier (LPG)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 35.6

  • BW Group68.2 (+92%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
BW Group2668.2+92%5810.62,5856.9%–
Segment median 35.60%

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9

  • BW Group5.5 (−30%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
BW Group45.5−30%8111.51,5272.9%–
Segment median 7.90%

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0

  • BW Group9.9 (−34%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
BW Group19.9−34%8710.92,7687.3%–
Segment median 15.00%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
BW GroupDNV (59), Lloyd's Register (19)27%79%76%0%

BW Group: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
LNG ONDOLNG9311579LNG carrier17.3 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1+143%8.841,054 t€1.1m
LNG KANOLNG9311567LNG carrier14.0 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1+97%6.59,659 t€257k
LNG OYOLNG9267003LNG carrier13.6 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1+91%9.614,973 t€401k
LNG BENUELNG9267015LNG carrier13.1 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1+83%7.010,159 t€272k
BW POLARIS9901984Gas carrier (LPG)64.3 g CO₂/t·nm35.4+81%12.32,626 t€71k
BW BRUSSELSLNG9368314LNG carrier12.5 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1+76%15.639,711 t€1.1m
BERGE ARZEWLNG9256597LNG carrier12.3 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1+73%11.86,526 t€193k
HAFNIA NESO9800312Oil tanker45.6 g CO₂/t·nm27.1+68%11.14,465 t€130k
HAFNIA GALATEA9796975Oil tanker42.7 g CO₂/t·nm27.1+57%9.41,320 t€42k
LNG IMOLNG9311581LNG carrier10.9 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1+53%11.236,989 t€987k
GAS TRUST9522269Gas carrier (LPG)89.7 g CO₂/t·nm62.3+44%11.24,968 t€192k
LNG ENUGULNG9266994LNG carrier10.1 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1+42%13.211,900 t€318k
HAFNIA ZAMBESI9393101Oil tanker14.7 g CO₂/t·nm10.4+42%9.914,748 t€548k
LNG LOKOJALNG9269960LNG carrier10.1 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1+42%13.65,468 t€147k
BWEK TENERIFE9506198Gas carrier (LPG)158 g CO₂/t·nm117+35%10.04,715 t€91k
BW PAVILION ARANDALNG9792606LNG carrier8.6 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1+21%11.28,853 t€235k
HAFNIA EXPERIENCE9735610Oil tanker7.4 g CO₂/t·nm6.3+18%11.81,756 t€46k
BWEK MAURITIUS9392250Gas carrier (LPG)72.5 g CO₂/t·nm62.3+16%11.34,642 t€51k
BW OSAKA9836567Bulk carrier5.2 g CO₂/t·nm4.8+6%11.59,378 t€248k
BW TULIPLNG9758064LNG carrier7.5 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1+6%17.011,123 t€298k
BW FRIGG9733337Gas carrier (LPG)15.2 g CO₂/t·nm14.4+5%14.03,974 t€106k
HELENA KOSAN9342396Gas carrier (LPG)123 g CO₂/t·nm117+5%9.58,489 t€411k
BW NARA9836373Bulk carrier8.1 g CO₂/t·nm8.0+2%11.82,295 t€61k
HAFNIA TAGUS9766205Oil tanker10.5 g CO₂/t·nm10.4+1%9.73,390 t€100k
HAFNIA LOIRELNG9941697Oil tanker6.3 g CO₂/t·nm6.30%9.917,002 t€595k
SOPHIA KOSAN9374557Gas carrier (LPG)117 g CO₂/t·nm1170%9.98,065 t€413k
EPIC SARDINIA9733571Gas carrier (LPG)62.1 g CO₂/t·nm62.30%10.76,881 t€210k
BWEK ARUBA9383338Gas carrier (LPG)115 g CO₂/t·nm117−1%8.8559 t€23k
BW VAR9748227Gas carrier (LPG)14.1 g CO₂/t·nm14.4−2%14.54,321 t€116k
BW PAVILION ARANTHERALNG9850678LNG carrier7.0 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1−2%13.712,019 t€322k

30 of 78 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.