Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

YARA KARA

IMO: 9734836
Type: Gas carrier
Average cargo carried: 6,796 t
Port of registry: Oslo
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.93 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Yara LPG Shipping AS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,796 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

77.1 kg/nm

Gas carrier (LPG) median 81.5 kg/nm (−5%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

35.38

g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 35.56 (−1%)

Average speed

12.3 kn

Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.6 kn (−2%)

Fuel per day at sea

22.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,001 t

CO₂ emitted

21,828 t

22,171 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

90,783 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

7,383 h

308 days, 84% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 77.1 kg/nm · median 81.5 (−5%)

49.8Ranks 145 of 355, lowest first124.4

Average speedThis ship 12.3 kn · median 12.6 (−2%)

8.8Faster than 46% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 35.38 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.56 (−1%)

14.36Ranks 175 of 355, lowest first120.18

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports13%
From the EU40%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU2%

58% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (12,604 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.4 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

YARA KARA
Gas carrier (LPG) median

70.075.080.085.090.095.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

YARA KARA
Gas carrier (LPG) median

10.011.012.013.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

YARA KARA
Gas carrier (LPG) median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.5 kn	+1%	−2%	+16%	−4%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	+2%	+1%	+1%	+6%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	−1%	+6%	+5%	−12%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.3 kn	+1%	−9%	−1%	+25%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	−12%	−6%	+10%	−22%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	+11%	+9%	−19%	+21%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.3 kn	+0%	+3%	+4%	−0%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Yara LPG Shipping AS	7,001	21,828	90,783	7,383	12.3	77.1	35.38	–
2024	Yara LPG Shipping AS	5,968	18,615	78,354	6,138	12.8	76.2	36.77	–
2023	not published	5,827	18,193	77,777	6,084	12.8	74.9	34.81	–
2022	not published	5,598	17,476	73,942	6,166	12.0	75.7	39.74	–
2021	not published	5,616	17,522	74,918	5,615	13.3	75.0	31.84	–
2020	not published	5,805	18,142	68,128	5,462	12.5	85.2	41.06	–
2019	not published	6,435	20,095	84,136	6,641	12.7	76.5	33.98	–
2018	not published	6,154	19,212	80,667	6,492	12.4	76.3	34.00	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Gas carrier (LPG) median	vs Gas carrier (LPG)	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Yara LPG Shipping AS	35.38	35.56	−1%	175 of 355	DNV	B+C
2024	Yara LPG Shipping AS	36.77	35.82	+3%	161 of 306	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	34.81	41.77	−17%	142 of 330	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	39.74	42.53	−7%	168 of 348	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	31.84	46.91	−32%	99 of 323	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	41.06	42.29	−3%	165 of 339	DNV	B+C
2019	not published	33.98	45.85	−26%	125 of 331	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	34.00	53.11	−36%	98 of 297	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.