Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

YARA KARA

IMO: 9734836
Type: Gas carrier
Average cargo carried: 6,796 t
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: Oslo
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.93 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Yara LPG Shipping AS

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,720 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

74.9

Gas carrier (LPG) median 83.3 kg/nm (−10%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

34.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 41.8 (−17%)

Average speed

12.8 kn

Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.8 kn (+0%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,827 t

CO₂ emitted

18,193 t

Distance sailed

77,777 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,084 h

254 days, 69% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 77.1 kg/nm · median 81.5 (−5%)

49.8Ranks 145 of 355, lowest first124

Average speedThis ship 12.3 kn · median 12.6 (−2%)

8.8Faster than 46% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 35.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.6 (−1%)

14.4Ranks 175 of 355, lowest first120

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports36%
From the EU28%
Into the EU29%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,157 t

6.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

YARA KARA
Gas carrier (LPG) median

70.075.080.085.090.095.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

YARA KARA
Gas carrier (LPG) median

10.011.012.013.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

YARA KARA
Gas carrier (LPG) median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.5 kn	+1%	−2%	+16%	−4%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	+2%	+1%	+1%	+6%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	−1%	+6%	+5%	−12%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.3 kn	+1%	−9%	−1%	+25%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	−12%	−6%	+10%	−22%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	+11%	+9%	−19%	+21%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.3 kn	+0%	+3%	+4%	−0%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Yara LPG Shipping AS	7,001	21,828	90,783	7,383	12.3	77.1	35.4	–
2024	Yara LPG Shipping AS	5,968	18,615	78,354	6,138	12.8	76.2	36.8	–
2023	not published	5,827	18,193	77,777	6,084	12.8	74.9	34.8	–
2022	not published	5,598	17,476	73,942	6,166	12.0	75.7	39.7	–
2021	not published	5,616	17,522	74,918	5,615	13.3	75.0	31.8	–
2020	not published	5,805	18,142	68,128	5,462	12.5	85.2	41.1	–
2019	not published	6,435	20,095	84,136	6,641	12.7	76.5	34.0	–
2018	not published	6,154	19,212	80,667	6,492	12.4	76.3	34.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Gas carrier (LPG) median	vs Gas carrier (LPG)	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Yara LPG Shipping AS	35.4	35.6	−1%	175 of 355	DNV	B+C
2024	Yara LPG Shipping AS	36.8	35.8	+3%	161 of 306	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	34.8	41.8	−17%	142 of 330	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	39.7	42.5	−7%	168 of 348	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	31.8	46.9	−32%	99 of 323	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	41.1	42.3	−3%	165 of 339	DNV	B+C
2019	not published	34.0	45.9	−26%	125 of 331	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	34.0	53.1	−36%	98 of 297	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.