Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

YARA NAUMA

IMO: 9734848
Type: Gas carrier
Average cargo carried: 6,374 t
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: Oslo
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.94 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Yara LPG Shipping AS

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,217 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

71.8

Gas carrier (LPG) median 83.3 kg/nm (−14%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

36.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 41.8 (−14%)

Average speed

12.5 kn

Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.8 kn (−2%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,031 t

CO₂ emitted

18,810 t

Distance sailed

83,930 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,696 h

279 days, 76% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 77.1 kg/nm · median 81.5 (−5%)

49.8Ranks 144 of 355, lowest first124

Average speedThis ship 12.3 kn · median 12.6 (−2%)

8.8Faster than 46% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 37.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.6 (+6%)

14.4Ranks 188 of 355, lowest first120

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports18%
From the EU41%
Into the EU38%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

687 t

3.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

YARA NAUMA
Gas carrier (LPG) median

70.075.080.085.090.095.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

YARA NAUMA
Gas carrier (LPG) median

10.011.012.013.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

YARA NAUMA
Gas carrier (LPG) median

30.035.040.045.050.055.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	+0%	−3%	−1%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	+7%	+8%	−6%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	−4%	−6%	+5%	+6%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.2 kn	−1%	+2%	+29%	−9%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	−8%	−5%	−10%	−12%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.7 kn	+11%	+17%	−6%	+21%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	−15%	−18%	−3%	−3%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Yara LPG Shipping AS	6,045	18,872	78,410	6,383	12.3	77.1	37.8	–
2024	Yara LPG Shipping AS	6,075	18,961	78,898	6,261	12.6	77.0	36.6	–
2023	not published	6,031	18,810	83,930	6,696	12.5	71.8	36.1	–
2022	not published	5,974	18,639	79,697	6,220	12.8	75.0	34.2	–
2021	not published	4,674	14,589	62,021	4,937	12.6	75.4	37.7	–
2020	not published	5,638	17,606	69,108	5,629	12.3	81.6	43.0	–
2019	not published	5,443	17,025	73,738	6,373	11.6	73.8	35.6	–
2018	not published	6,580	20,560	75,725	6,291	12.0	86.9	36.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Gas carrier (LPG) median	vs Gas carrier (LPG)	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Yara LPG Shipping AS	37.8	35.6	+6%	188 of 355	DNV	B+C
2024	Yara LPG Shipping AS	36.6	35.8	+2%	159 of 306	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	36.1	41.8	−14%	148 of 330	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	34.2	42.5	−20%	150 of 348	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	37.7	46.9	−20%	126 of 323	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	43.0	42.3	+2%	176 of 339	DNV	B+C
2019	not published	35.6	45.9	−22%	134 of 331	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	36.8	53.1	−31%	113 of 297	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.