Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

YARA SELA

IMO: 9734850
Type: Gas carrier
Average cargo carried: 6,756 t
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: Oslo
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.86 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Yara LPG Shipping AS

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,399 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

72.6

Gas carrier (LPG) median 83.3 kg/nm (−13%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

30.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 41.8 (−27%)

Average speed

13.5 kn

Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.8 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,617 t

CO₂ emitted

20,645 t

Distance sailed

91,129 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,766 h

282 days, 77% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 73.0 kg/nm · median 81.5 (−10%)

49.8Ranks 111 of 355, lowest first124

Average speedThis ship 12.7 kn · median 12.6 (+1%)

8.8Faster than 52% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 33.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.6 (−5%)

14.4Ranks 169 of 355, lowest first120

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports13%
From the EU38%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

361 t

1.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

YARA SELA
Gas carrier (LPG) median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

YARA SELA
Gas carrier (LPG) median

10.011.012.013.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

YARA SELA
Gas carrier (LPG) median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	−4%	−3%	+6%	−6%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.9 kn	+4%	−3%	−6%	+17%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.1 kn	+4%	+14%	+20%	−18%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	−8%	−12%	−6%	+11%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	+1%	+1%	+4%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+2.8 kn	−3%	+23%	+17%	−11%	2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.5 kn	−1%	−13%	−11%	+6%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Yara LPG Shipping AS	6,639	20,726	90,978	7,174	12.7	73.0	33.7	–
2024	Yara LPG Shipping AS	6,488	20,252	85,565	6,809	12.6	75.8	36.0	–
2023	not published	6,617	20,645	91,129	6,766	13.5	72.6	30.6	–
2022	not published	5,296	16,534	75,943	6,149	12.4	69.7	37.3	–
2021	not published	6,148	19,203	80,800	6,293	12.8	76.1	33.6	–
2020	not published	5,877	18,348	77,838	6,092	12.8	75.5	34.0	–
2019	not published	5,180	16,177	66,453	6,613	10.0	77.9	38.4	–
2018	not published	5,885	18,369	75,014	6,534	11.5	78.5	36.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Gas carrier (LPG) median	vs Gas carrier (LPG)	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Yara LPG Shipping AS	33.7	35.6	−5%	169 of 355	DNV	B+C
2024	Yara LPG Shipping AS	36.0	35.8	+0%	155 of 306	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	30.6	41.8	−27%	121 of 330	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	37.3	42.5	−12%	158 of 348	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	33.6	46.9	−28%	107 of 323	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	34.0	42.3	−20%	140 of 339	DNV	B+C
2019	not published	38.4	45.9	−16%	146 of 331	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	36.1	53.1	−32%	109 of 297	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.