Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

CHRISTOPHE DE MARGERIE

IMO: 9737187
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EIV 10.35 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: PC3
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Gas Carriers SCF Mgmt FZCO

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

299

LNG carrier median 252 kg/nm (+18%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

22.5

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.4 (+117%)

Average speed

15.7 kn

LNG carrier median 14.1 kn (+11%)

Fuel per day at sea

112.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

27,078 t

CO₂ emitted

74,567 t

Distance sailed

90,677 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,788 h

241 days, 66% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 312 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 371 kg/nm · median 205 (+82%)

148Ranks 300 of 312, lowest first328

Average speedThis ship 14.9 kn · median 14.6 (+2%)

11.0Faster than 60% of LNG carrier ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 12.0 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.39 (+63%)

4.54Ranks 254 of 312, lowest first17.3

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU45%
Into the EU49%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4,549 t

6.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CHRISTOPHE DE MARGERIE
LNG carrier median

200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

CHRISTOPHE DE MARGERIE
LNG carrier median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

CHRISTOPHE DE MARGERIE
LNG carrier median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	−1.4 kn	+7%	−3%	+5%	+8%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	+17%	+22%	−52%	−51%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.7 kn	−17%	−21%	+26%	−15%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	−6%	−3%	+4%	−8%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.9 kn	−11%	−5%	−6%	−8%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.0 kn	+16%	+24%	−16%	+8%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024LNG	Gas Carriers SCF Mgmt FZCO	16,924	45,179	45,598	3,052	14.9	371	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	15,102	41,592	43,375	2,654	16.3	348	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	27,078	74,567	90,677	5,788	15.7	299	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	25,921	72,626	71,908	4,386	16.4	361	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	26,739	73,674	69,451	4,380	15.9	385	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	31,833	88,119	73,903	4,943	15.0	431	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	32,671	90,315	87,892	6,267	14.0	372	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024LNG	Gas Carriers SCF Mgmt FZCO	12.0	7.39	+63%	254 of 312	Indian Register of Shipping	B+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	11.1	9.10	+22%	245 of 355	Indian Register of Shipping	B+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	22.5	10.4	+117%	329 of 379	Indian Register of Shipping	B+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	26.4	10.5	+152%	271 of 289	Indian Register of Shipping	B+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	28.7	10.7	+168%	258 of 267	ABS	B+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	31.2	10.9	+187%	233 of 248	ABS	B+C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	28.8	10.9	+164%	188 of 197	ABS	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.