Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

LADY

IMO: 9737369
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 39,484 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3.91 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: KMARIN MELBOURNE, VANTAGE LADY

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Vantage Shipping Lines SA

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 39,484 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

102.9 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (+25%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.14

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (+3%)

Average speed

9.1 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−15%)

Fuel per day at sea

22.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

804 t

CO₂ emitted

2,513 t

2,552 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

7,818 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

861 h

36 days, 10% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 102.9 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+25%)

61.0Ranks 3,014 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 9.1 kn · median 10.7 (−15%)

8.8Faster than 12% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.14 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (+3%)

4.80Ranks 1,906 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports11%
From the EU12%
Into the EU66%
At berth in the EU10%

0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

10.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

LADY
Bulk carrier median

80.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LADY
Bulk carrier median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

LADY
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	–	–	–	–	–
2023→2024	–	–	–	–	–
2022→2023	−2.3 kn	+19%	−2%	−32%	+55%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	+12%	+11%	−28%	+14%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2021	−0.1 kn	−16%	−17%	+204%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+4.1 kn	−8%	+34%	−47%	−7%	4.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Vantage Shipping Lines SA	804	2,513	7,818	861	9.1	102.9	8.14	–
2025part-year	Cosmoship Management S.A.	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2025	Total Shipmanagement Services	804	2,513	7,818	861	9.1	102.9	8.14	–
2024	Vantage Shipping Lines SA	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2023	not published	988	3,097	8,838	850	10.4	111.8	11.39	–
2022	not published	1,223	3,868	13,011	1,025	12.7	94.0	7.33	–
2021	not published	1,511	4,786	18,017	1,412	12.8	83.9	6.42	–
2019	not published	592	1,852	5,935	459	12.9	99.8	6.70	–
2018	not published	1,225	3,822	11,259	1,273	8.8	108.8	7.21	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Vantage Shipping Lines SA	–	–	–	–	ICS Verification Services	A
2025part-year	Cosmoship Management S.A.	–	–	–	–	EMICERT	A
2025	Total Shipmanagement Services	8.14	7.89	+3%	1,906 of 3,610	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Vantage Shipping Lines SA	–	–	–	–	ICS Verification Services	A
2023	not published	11.39	8.27	+38%	2,661 of 3,548	ICS Verification Services	A
2022	not published	7.33	8.71	−16%	1,309 of 3,968	Verifavia	B
2021	not published	6.42	8.57	−25%	749 of 3,466	Verifavia	B
2019	not published	6.70	8.38	−20%	968 of 3,360	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	7.21	8.50	−15%	1,130 of 3,384	Verifavia	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.